Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not a bargain, but it's nice. Condo prices always need to be balanced with the condo fees - high fees mean lower prices. That means it's probably not a great investment, but you'd have to see if it is better than renting.
It looks like lots of Boston apartments - very compact but convenient.
I am not sure what the long term future is for City Center. The smash and grab robberies at the luxury stores are concerning (Chanel hit twice recently) and with the arena moving out of DC that may make the whole are less lively. It's too bad, because it had promise.
I hope the city council just doesn’t give up on downtown. It took years of planning and sweat and tears to bring nice retail back downtown. But it seems priorities lay elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all sound like a bunch of petty, jealous and out of touch old ladies. It’s a friggin 1 BR CONDO in the downtown. It’s not one of your boring colonials in Upper Caucasia where nothing is going on. 635 square feet is a decent size for a 1 BR, especially one with an open floor plan, and that condo fees covers quite a bit not to mention a parking space.
We had a 640 sf condo in Logan that we sold several years ago for 500k. It was the same size as this unit, and was big enough to have a den and a bedroom and was plenty spacious.
This is not a bad deal at all. You’re all clueless.
Cool it, angry poster.
I lived in a condo similar to this one for a few years in my late 20s. It's the condo for an associate or analyst starting out in their career. You see the exact same soulless overpriced condo/apartment in every major city and global city. Identical twins exist in Dubai and Singapore and London and Tokyo and Sydney. And it is tiny. It's a hotel suite for people who have hotel lives, overpaid, overworked, overtravelled, and ephemeral, and that's all there is to it.
Yup. I truthfully last week was in a near clone of this except an additional bedroom on the other side, and same cabinets but gray, in Jakarta. They all look pretty much the same. Not much that can be done with them really they are so small. I lived in a similar but much bigger 1 br apartment for a decade. Regret it now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all sound like a bunch of petty, jealous and out of touch old ladies. It’s a friggin 1 BR CONDO in the downtown. It’s not one of your boring colonials in Upper Caucasia where nothing is going on. 635 square feet is a decent size for a 1 BR, especially one with an open floor plan, and that condo fees covers quite a bit not to mention a parking space.
We had a 640 sf condo in Logan that we sold several years ago for 500k. It was the same size as this unit, and was big enough to have a den and a bedroom and was plenty spacious.
This is not a bad deal at all. You’re all clueless.
Cool it, angry poster.
I lived in a condo similar to this one for a few years in my late 20s. It's the condo for an associate or analyst starting out in their career. You see the exact same soulless overpriced condo/apartment in every major city and global city. Identical twins exist in Dubai and Singapore and London and Tokyo and Sydney. And it is tiny. It's a hotel suite for people who have hotel lives, overpaid, overworked, overtravelled, and ephemeral, and that's all there is to it.
Anonymous wrote:You all sound like a bunch of petty, jealous and out of touch old ladies. It’s a friggin 1 BR CONDO in the downtown. It’s not one of your boring colonials in Upper Caucasia where nothing is going on. 635 square feet is a decent size for a 1 BR, especially one with an open floor plan, and that condo fees covers quite a bit not to mention a parking space.
We had a 640 sf condo in Logan that we sold several years ago for 500k. It was the same size as this unit, and was big enough to have a den and a bedroom and was plenty spacious.
This is not a bad deal at all. You’re all clueless.
Anonymous wrote:It's not a bargain, but it's nice. Condo prices always need to be balanced with the condo fees - high fees mean lower prices. That means it's probably not a great investment, but you'd have to see if it is better than renting.
It looks like lots of Boston apartments - very compact but convenient.
I am not sure what the long term future is for City Center. The smash and grab robberies at the luxury stores are concerning (Chanel hit twice recently) and with the arena moving out of DC that may make the whole are less lively. It's too bad, because it had promise.
Anonymous wrote:You all sound like a bunch of petty, jealous and out of touch old ladies. It’s a friggin 1 BR CONDO in the downtown. It’s not one of your boring colonials in Upper Caucasia where nothing is going on. 635 square feet is a decent size for a 1 BR, especially one with an open floor plan, and that condo fees covers quite a bit not to mention a parking space.
We had a 640 sf condo in Logan that we sold several years ago for 500k. It was the same size as this unit, and was big enough to have a den and a bedroom and was plenty spacious.
This is not a bad deal at all. You’re all clueless.
Anonymous wrote:You all sound like a bunch of petty, jealous and out of touch old ladies. It’s a friggin 1 BR CONDO in the downtown. It’s not one of your boring colonials in Upper Caucasia where nothing is going on. 635 square feet is a decent size for a 1 BR, especially one with an open floor plan, and that condo fees covers quite a bit not to mention a parking space.
We had a 640 sf condo in Logan that we sold several years ago for 500k. It was the same size as this unit, and was big enough to have a den and a bedroom and was plenty spacious.
This is not a bad deal at all. You’re all clueless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I assumed the pricing was originally propped up by the Qataris or something. That development never made sense without some sort of political and/or corruption angle.
The development made perfect sense. As the old convention center was torn down at the City Center site, the city planned for a mixed use retail center to revive the downtown shopping scene, which was traditionally focused on F and G Streets, where the big fancy department stores were. DC’s mayor and councilors wanted a downtown Bloomingdale’s, but eventually settled on the upscale mixed use City Center development. DC real estate was hot at the time, especially downtown. There’s nothing shady about it. The developers hired architects out of Europe to give it that extra edge, and the pedestrian “alleys” with shops are based on the traditional alleys of DC. Adding to the neighborhood’s allure, Apple decided to locate its flagship Apple Store in the old library a block from City Center at Mt Vernon Sq.
The last piece of the City Center master plan to be developed will be the first class landmark office tower, designed by another famous European architect, to be located where the temporary surface parking lot is.
Anonymous wrote:I assumed the pricing was originally propped up by the Qataris or something. That development never made sense without some sort of political and/or corruption angle.