Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what?
So - would you respond “so what?” to a whites-only, public officials party?
The tired "gotcha-fails" of the ignorant.
Anonymous wrote:Is asexual under that banner now? Will wonders never cease.
Anonymous wrote:Is asexual under that banner now? Will wonders never cease.
Anonymous wrote:Wait until OP finds out about the Congressional Black Caucus.
How so? Everyone knows that DEI means hire more black people at all cost.Anonymous wrote:Sounds like a DEI violation to me.
Anonymous wrote:Wait until OP finds out about the Congressional Black Caucus.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone identifies as a person of color. This party is for everyone. Nothing burger, move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what?
So - would you respond “so what?” to a whites-only, public officials party?
The tired "gotcha-fails" of the ignorant.
Not PP but in the government it is very inappropriate to have an event that is either restricted to one race or seemingly excludes other races. It's ok to have a party celebrating specific diversity so long as it's open to everyone.
Congressional Black Caucus
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what?
So - would you respond “so what?” to a whites-only, public officials party?
The tired "gotcha-fails" of the ignorant.
Not PP but in the government it is very inappropriate to have an event that is either restricted to one race or seemingly excludes other races. It's ok to have a party celebrating specific diversity so long as it's open to everyone.
Anonymous wrote:But, couldn’t a member who is LGTBQIA+ also be invited?