Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most people are somewhat bi, or would be, given the opportunity. I also think people tend to decide what they like over time and what they like changes over time. I would love to see all the identitarian talk (at least in UMC liberal environments) evolve past the stage where it's something to be celebrated and just become something that is. Your seventh grader is not "brave" for being pan. They are twelve. That's it.
People tend to use themselves as a template for how other people are. This is why so many bisexual people say most people are “a little bi”. I’ve heard nonbinary people say everyone is a little nonbinary and no one has a binary gender. You’re queer and it’s important to understand that means you can’t make statements like this because you aren’t a template for most humans. Most people are cisgender and heterosexual. This is also why gay men will say bi men are closeted bi and straight women will say that bi women are trying to be edgy or trying to get attention. It’s these straight people using themselves as a template for everyone else.
I suppose. It's just that in my own lived experience, it's what I observed. Everyone I knew in college tried on different roles and different relationships. The majority did end up in cis het relationships, (I didn't), but that's also in line with population demographics, or, as you would have it, the percentage of people who are left-handed. (Although being left handed has nothing to do with identity.)
When you remove social stigma from same sex relationships, a lot more people consider them an option. I tend to think some people are more omnivorous than others, but again, I also think what one prefers, how one identifies, and what kinds of people one is attracted to changes over time. Life is long. Your identity and what you prefer in a partner aren't things that you decide at age 12 and stay the same forever--necessarily.
For some they do stay the same. But not all.
And this is one huge reason I'd really love us all to evolve beyond all of these quirky and special labels that all mean queer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Same reason so many more people are left handed in 1940 vs 1920.
????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re queer and it’s important to understand that means you can’t make statements like this because you aren’t a template for most humans. Most people are cisgender and heterosexual. This is also why gay men will say bi men are closeted bi and straight women will say that bi women are trying to be edgy or trying to get attention. It’s these straight people using themselves as a template for everyone else.
People are more than who they want to sleep with. There's less difference between anyone than you seem to think. And, as I said, what we like evolves over time. Some men do identify as bisexual before they come out. Some women do say they're bisexual before they have the experience to determine if that's true. Some people identify as nonbinary before--or after--discovering they are trans. Some people become aromantic after experience. Some people become pansexual after being asexual. Etc.
All I'm asking you do is consider that identity and sexual preferences are moving targets, not static ones. We in the US are somewhat privileged enough (at least in some places) to live in a culture where we're allowed to choose, or to realize who we are. But identity isn't carved in stone. It can change and evolve and that's all part of the wonder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most people are somewhat bi, or would be, given the opportunity. I also think people tend to decide what they like over time and what they like changes over time. I would love to see all the identitarian talk (at least in UMC liberal environments) evolve past the stage where it's something to be celebrated and just become something that is. Your seventh grader is not "brave" for being pan. They are twelve. That's it.
People tend to use themselves as a template for how other people are. This is why so many bisexual people say most people are “a little bi”. I’ve heard nonbinary people say everyone is a little nonbinary and no one has a binary gender. You’re queer and it’s important to understand that means you can’t make statements like this because you aren’t a template for most humans. Most people are cisgender and heterosexual. This is also why gay men will say bi men are closeted bi and straight women will say that bi women are trying to be edgy or trying to get attention. It’s these straight people using themselves as a template for everyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll be happy when we get rid of this "bi" term. No need to reinforce the harmful myth of the binary.
I'm pansexual. But I don't go around discussing it. Mainly because I assume my romantic/sexual proclivity is boring to anyone but myself.
The word "binary" is not a bad word. The idea that there are male animals and female animals is acceptable, yes? There are also male humans and female humans. That has nothing to do with whether or not they have short edgy haircuts and like to wear ties.
Well that was ignorant and offensive...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my experience, a lot of women are bi (or bi-curious) even if they’ve only been with men. I knew I was bi before high school - and here I am, at 38, still bi!
It’s amazing that for a group centered around equality biphobia is still acceptable.
Biphobia in the workplace queer community is a lot less frequent than it used to be but it still exists. This board has a lot of straight people that post on it.
Anonymous wrote:In my experience, a lot of women are bi (or bi-curious) even if they’ve only been with men. I knew I was bi before high school - and here I am, at 38, still bi!
It’s amazing that for a group centered around equality biphobia is still acceptable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll be happy when we get rid of this "bi" term. No need to reinforce the harmful myth of the binary.
I'm pansexual. But I don't go around discussing it. Mainly because I assume my romantic/sexual proclivity is boring to anyone but myself.
The word "binary" is not a bad word. The idea that there are male animals and female animals is acceptable, yes? There are also male humans and female humans. That has nothing to do with whether or not they have short edgy haircuts and like to wear ties.
Anonymous wrote:I think most people are somewhat bi, or would be, given the opportunity. I also think people tend to decide what they like over time and what they like changes over time. I would love to see all the identitarian talk (at least in UMC liberal environments) evolve past the stage where it's something to be celebrated and just become something that is. Your seventh grader is not "brave" for being pan. They are twelve. That's it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Same reason so many more people are left handed in 1940 vs 1920.
????
Anonymous wrote:I'll be happy when we get rid of this "bi" term. No need to reinforce the harmful myth of the binary.
I'm pansexual. But I don't go around discussing it. Mainly because I assume my romantic/sexual proclivity is boring to anyone but myself.
Anonymous wrote:Same reason so many more people are left handed in 1940 vs 1920.