Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is it okay to take AP Physics in Sophomore year.?
My DS wants to lessen his AP's in Junior and Senior year and has decided to take AP Physics next year (Sophomore year).
Do colleges look at what year students take courses? Is this something we should worry about? He is gearing towards pre med . So, has to take AP Chem, AP Bio and AP Physics and AP Calculus.
Possibly, looking at direct med programs. So, junior and senior year will be intense. To ease the load, he decided to take AP Physics Sophmore year. Prereq. for that is Algebra 2.
Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks!
Physics teacher here. I would recommend taking AP Physics C the same year as AP BC Calculus. The 1st quarters of each are parallel and reinforce each other. AP Physics C is more consistent for students in advanced math to earn a 5.
AP Physics 1 isn’t “easier”.
It’s actually very rigorous conceptually, which is harder for younger teens whose brains aren’t as developed for abstract reasoning. I think it is a great course STEM bound students to take as seniors, if they aren’t at calculus yet. Otherwise, I think AP Physics C is the better course for high school students.
How can it be conceptually rigorous, did you mean to say conceptually demanding? All physics is built up from mathematics, so saying it's rigorous conceptually seems contradictory unless it's also rigorous mathematically.
This is a common misunderstanding from how physics is often taught. It would be better to say mathematics is the language used to describe physics. Newton invented calculus as a mathematical process to explain physical concepts.
All physics is built up from experimentation and using the results to determine relationships between various variables. Those relationships are where the physics equations come from. Many courses teach physics from the perspective of providing the equations and then plug-and-chug away with word problems. Not AP Physics 1. It has kids analyze new situations and explain how to determine something in a multi-step process linking several physics concepts, without a number crunch. Or kids describe an experiment, or analyze given data, or tell what else would change in an experiment if something was changed.
Go look at the released free response questions - they aren’t simple.
The questions aren’t that hard either. The issue it’s the first time students are asked to apply mathematics to a situation that is governed by a set of principles so it’s feels difficult compared to the plug and chug formulas.
Also there are surprisingly few good physics teachers that can give a coherent picture of the material.
The problem with taking physics 1&2 is that it takes two years, while most introductory classes for chemistry and biology are only one year. You won’t get college credit towards any stem degree either. Since the prerequisite is only Algebra 2 it leaves out any oscillations and waves, and the subject matter treatment is very superficial and the questions focus more on some minute details rather than the big picture.
It’s much better to take AP Physics C, the actual material is closer to a college physics class, and it is a great example of using higher level math to solve more concrete problems. The issue with AP physics C is that it leaves out thermodynamics, optics, atomic and molecular which would be very useful for chemistry.
There’s also the option of taking a dual enrollment/cc class which tend to move at a faster pace and are more complete covering the entire physics. For the very top students that’s the best option, but it’s not accessible for most because of math requirements: first semester mechanics (calculus), second semester EM, thermo (multivariable), third semester quantum, atomic, optics (linear algebra and diff eq). Some community colleges have some versions that require less math, still better in my view than AP physics 1&2.