Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaPo article describes education costing $4B for equity and leaving no child left behind.

Unmitigated progressive disaster. But at least they feel good about themselves for the progress. They never have to figure out how to pay for anything as long as it is someone else's money and they can raise taxes. Who needs roads and infrastructure?

Who needs schools?

Oh please, as if good education = $$$$.


Why can students in Sweden, Japan, China, and Singapore mop the floor with American students while they spend many fold less per student?


The state mandated a whole bunch of unfunded progressive mumbo jumbo for education that is costing billions of dollars which means it will need to cut elsewhere since progressive initiatives have hit the wall of reality in that there are only a limited number of dollars available.

How many billions of dollars have been dumped into schools in Baltimore yet performance remains abysmal?

Yes, it does. But nobody will stop you from advocating for cutting funding to improve schools, if that's what you want to do.

Baltimore gets some of the most money per student.

How about those results?

Do you think Baltimore public schools would be better if they received less funding?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaPo article describes education costing $4B for equity and leaving no child left behind.

Unmitigated progressive disaster. But at least they feel good about themselves for the progress. They never have to figure out how to pay for anything as long as it is someone else's money and they can raise taxes. Who needs roads and infrastructure?

Who needs schools?

Oh please, as if good education = $$$$.


Why can students in Sweden, Japan, China, and Singapore mop the floor with American students while they spend many fold less per student?


The state mandated a whole bunch of unfunded progressive mumbo jumbo for education that is costing billions of dollars which means it will need to cut elsewhere since progressive initiatives have hit the wall of reality in that there are only a limited number of dollars available.

How many billions of dollars have been dumped into schools in Baltimore yet performance remains abysmal?

Yes, it does. But nobody will stop you from advocating for cutting funding to improve schools, if that's what you want to do.

Baltimore gets some of the most money per student.

How about those results?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaPo article describes education costing $4B for equity and leaving no child left behind.

Unmitigated progressive disaster. But at least they feel good about themselves for the progress. They never have to figure out how to pay for anything as long as it is someone else's money and they can raise taxes. Who needs roads and infrastructure?

Who needs schools?

Oh please, as if good education = $$$$.


Why can students in Sweden, Japan, China, and Singapore mop the floor with American students while they spend many fold less per student?


The state mandated a whole bunch of unfunded progressive mumbo jumbo for education that is costing billions of dollars which means it will need to cut elsewhere since progressive initiatives have hit the wall of reality in that there are only a limited number of dollars available.

How many billions of dollars have been dumped into schools in Baltimore yet performance remains abysmal?

Yes, it does. But nobody will stop you from advocating for cutting funding to improve schools, if that's what you want to do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaPo article describes education costing $4B for equity and leaving no child left behind.

Unmitigated progressive disaster. But at least they feel good about themselves for the progress. They never have to figure out how to pay for anything as long as it is someone else's money and they can raise taxes. Who needs roads and infrastructure?

This is by design. Progressives hate roads.

The cuts to transportation also include cuts to buses and trains.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaPo article describes education costing $4B for equity and leaving no child left behind.

Unmitigated progressive disaster. But at least they feel good about themselves for the progress. They never have to figure out how to pay for anything as long as it is someone else's money and they can raise taxes. Who needs roads and infrastructure?

Who needs schools?

Oh please, as if good education = $$$$.


Why can students in Sweden, Japan, China, and Singapore mop the floor with American students while they spend many fold less per student?


The state mandated a whole bunch of unfunded progressive mumbo jumbo for education that is costing billions of dollars which means it will need to cut elsewhere since progressive initiatives have hit the wall of reality in that there are only a limited number of dollars available.

How many billions of dollars have been dumped into schools in Baltimore yet performance remains abysmal?

Anonymous wrote:WaPo article describes education costing $4B for equity and leaving no child left behind.

Unmitigated progressive disaster. But at least they feel good about themselves for the progress. They never have to figure out how to pay for anything as long as it is someone else's money and they can raise taxes. Who needs roads and infrastructure?

This is by design. Progressives hate roads.

Anonymous wrote:WaPo article describes education costing $4B for equity and leaving no child left behind.

Unmitigated progressive disaster. But at least they feel good about themselves for the progress. They never have to figure out how to pay for anything as long as it is someone else's money and they can raise taxes. Who needs roads and infrastructure?

Who needs schools?

WaPo article describes education costing $4B for equity and leaving no child left behind.

Unmitigated progressive disaster. But at least they feel good about themselves for the progress. They never have to figure out how to pay for anything as long as it is someone else's money and they can raise taxes. Who needs roads and infrastructure?

LOL, come to Virginia, where we get tax rebates and are still spending on infrastructure.

The second Kirwin was signed- it was an unfunded mandate.

This was all sadly predictable.

Anonymous wrote:It’s not just Maryland with filthy roads. We got it in NOVA too. It’s sad how many people just don’t care about littering. Retirees in our neighborhood though will head to high traffic roads (not interstates) with vests, buckets, and pickers and clean up trash once a month or so along the roadside. That’s nice to see.
I would love it if people sentenced to community service would be put on this kind of duty.
Our parish cleans up a nearby creek a few times a year. The first time we did it we filled up ten pick-up truck beds with litter.

Yep, agree
my kid’s school group cleaned up Scott’s Run and it was unreal how filthy such a beautiful spot had gotten

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It’s #1 in the United States for household wealth.

They need to cut. Spending is out of control for a small state with less area to cover. Cutting is the sign of fiscal responsibility

Yes, it is well-known that governments demonstrate fiscal responsibility by failing to provide government services.

Governments need to learn to do more with less like small businesses do all the time. Why should government provide grift jobs for slovenly mental midgets? Cut half the people and double the work to a normal small business amount for the remaining low IQ spastic losers.

Doing less with less, actually, but probably that is a feature for you, not a bug.

Pushing low IQ slovenly mental midget government drones to their highly limited max is tough love. They need a modicum of self esteem to know they can accomplish production at least close to their oversized consumption .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It’s #1 in the United States for household wealth.

They need to cut. Spending is out of control for a small state with less area to cover. Cutting is the sign of fiscal responsibility

Yes, it is well-known that governments demonstrate fiscal responsibility by failing to provide government services.

Governments need to learn to do more with less like small businesses do all the time. Why should government provide grift jobs for slovenly mental midgets? Cut half the people and double the work to a normal small business amount for the remaining low IQ spastic losers.

Doing less with less, actually, but probably that is a feature for you, not a bug.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It’s #1 in the United States for household wealth.

They need to cut. Spending is out of control for a small state with less area to cover. Cutting is the sign of fiscal responsibility

Yes, it is well-known that governments demonstrate fiscal responsibility by failing to provide government services.

Governments need to learn to do more with less like small businesses do all the time. Why should government provide grift jobs for slovenly mental midgets? Cut half the people and double the work to a normal small business amount for the remaining low IQ spastic losers.

Anonymous wrote:
It’s #1 in the United States for household wealth.

They need to cut. Spending is out of control for a small state with less area to cover. Cutting is the sign of fiscal responsibility

Yes, it is well-known that governments demonstrate fiscal responsibility by failing to provide government services.