Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:rates will be coming down soon, i don't think we will get to a reasonable 2-3% but a 4-5% could help move the market. Anything over 5% is completely unreasonable and the fed must be fired for doing that.
You must not understand that 5% is historically low.
2-3 % isn’t “reasonable.” It is an anomaly.
Higher rates are also better for savers, ie people in retirement. CD ladders are even returning
Another way boomers protect the wealth they have stolen from their children, oh yah make sure we pay your social security , gtfo
When interest rates are too low people try to chase returns in other ways. This leads to inflated values in real estate and instability in the stock market. Stable 5% returns on savings is a good thing.
Also, all that boomer money is going to go somewhere. Who do you think are most likely to benefit?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:rates will be coming down soon, i don't think we will get to a reasonable 2-3% but a 4-5% could help move the market. Anything over 5% is completely unreasonable and the fed must be fired for doing that.
You must not understand that 5% is historically low.
2-3 % isn’t “reasonable.” It is an anomaly.
Higher rates are also better for savers, ie people in retirement. CD ladders are even returning
Another way boomers protect the wealth they have stolen from their children, oh yah make sure we pay your social security , gtfo
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:rates will be coming down soon, i don't think we will get to a reasonable 2-3% but a 4-5% could help move the market. Anything over 5% is completely unreasonable and the fed must be fired for doing that.
You must not understand that 5% is historically low.
2-3 % isn’t “reasonable.” It is an anomaly.
Higher rates are also better for savers, ie people in retirement. CD ladders are even returning
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:rates will be coming down soon, i don't think we will get to a reasonable 2-3% but a 4-5% could help move the market. Anything over 5% is completely unreasonable and the fed must be fired for doing that.
You must not understand that 5% is historically low.
2-3 % isn’t “reasonable.” It is an anomaly.
Higher rates are also better for savers, ie people in retirement. CD ladders are even returning [/quote
Another way the boomer protect the wealth they have stolen from their children
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rates should be under 5 , government needs to step in and do that
This would be laughable if it weren’t so sadly naive and entitled. I literally never heard anyone express this notion for the forty years or so when rates barely ever dropped that low. Interest rates only react to inflation, deflation, recession, inflating bubbles, and bursting bubbles. Absent any concerns in those areas, they are considered to be at equilibrium.
Anonymous wrote:rates will be coming down soon, i don't think we will get to a reasonable 2-3% but a 4-5% could help move the market. Anything over 5% is completely unreasonable and the fed must be fired for doing that.
Anonymous wrote:rates will be coming down soon, i don't think we will get to a reasonable 2-3% but a 4-5% could help move the market. Anything over 5% is completely unreasonable and the fed must be fired for doing that.
We bought in 1996 at over 8% and still live here. People shouldn’t move very often once they have purchased a house.Anonymous wrote:We bought in 2021 at 3.8% interest rate and we will never leave the house. I feel badly for people trying to buy now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rates should be under 5 , government needs to step in and do that
This would be laughable if it weren’t so sadly naive and entitled. I literally never heard anyone express this notion for the forty years or so when rates barely ever dropped that low. Interest rates only react to inflation, deflation, recession, inflating bubbles, and bursting bubbles. Absent any concerns in those areas, they are considered to be at equilibrium.
Anonymous wrote:Rates should be under 5 , government needs to step in and do that
Anonymous wrote:
If you need a house you should buy a house. But it needs to be a house you can stay in forever if you had to. If you can’t afford that don’t buy anything lesser.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Captain Obvious strikes again.
Really? We were told in 2020 just wait...there's a deluge of properties coming to market