Anonymous wrote:It would enhance an undergraduate college application, but honestly it would be more valuable to the application of someone who is not both Asian and male.
It really has become stereo-typical (whether fair or unfair) for Asian males to pursue math/science ECs like this.
An Asian male who went to a selective Governor’s School in the summer - for a non-STEM subject - might have a more valuable differentiator, by showing the student was more rounded and was capable of high achievement in more than just math/science.
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, there's endless criticism of useless humanities degrees, and everyone seems to forget math is the OG humanities degree that commands zero respect. People have always disparaged mathematicians, they always will. Want a little insight into the current landscape, the New Yorker article on eliminating grad math in WV should do: https://t.co/p3qCC0Eh5i. Good at math there are two options. One, get an engineering degree or similar (from anywhere), become a corporate cog, support a family, keep an eye out to ride the layoff wave to the next job. Or, two, just love math and somehow be self-sustaining with a pad of paper. MOP qualification is an anchor not a hook!
(like this guy - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Simons_(mathematician)). All kidding aside (and Jim Simons is a great!), I agree that MOP qualification is probably an anchor. I would have assumed that a kid who is among the top 50 odd kids in math in all of US high schools and perhaps have other accomplishments (GPA, community service etc.) would be a bit more sought after. Isn't the point of college to learn, and kids who have demonstrated some degree of academic excellence might serve that?