Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, DCUM is way out of touch with how actual college kids use the term NARP. Your post is cringey and awkward, possibly because you learned about the term from DCUM. I would avoid the term if I were you.
Without using the term, what exactly are you looking for?
Absent the term, OP was pretty clear in what they were seeking.
Yep.
Someone needs to stop “ranting” on here every time someone pisses her off
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the main concern here is that the kid will only be friends with gay dudes or extreme dorks if he doesn't play a sport and I think that is a legit concern.
I think the main concern is you might be a bigot?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, DCUM is way out of touch with how actual college kids use the term NARP. Your post is cringey and awkward, possibly because you learned about the term from DCUM. I would avoid the term if I were you.
Without using the term, what exactly are you looking for?
I dont think it's very cringey. There's a known issue on college campuses now with 35% kids who are athletes and have a lot of their time eaten up with that. Add a whole other layer of colleges doing their best to admit gay kids (among other minority groups), you can end up with a low number of straight non-athlete males. Too complicated to go into here IMO, but it's a real issue. Don't care if you think it's cringey.
I think the gay/straight thing can be an issue (I have a trans kid so I look at these numbers), but so can specialty programs. if you have a LAC with a big architecture program, for example, those kids often are very much a group that's hard to break into. sometimes CS kids can be like this.
I'd stay away from the very small sub-2k schools.
Actually, I think the small sub 2k schools are less likely to have the cliques. People just end up all knowing each other there's so much overlap. I went to one of these. I found my social group was larger and more varied than my DH who went to a larger university.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, it's a problem at LACs. The percentage of guys who are straight and not athletes is increasingly tiny. It can be really hard for those students to find a community.
I think it's a genuine issue. Most LACs are not appealing places for straight boys who don't play competitive sports. But this is what most LACs chose.
Personally, I wouldn't bother. I would try to find a university on the smaller side. If he's a stellar student, something like Dartmouth or Rice. They're big enough for everyone to find their space, but small enough to get the liberal arts college experience.
I genuinely would not encourage a straight, non-athlete boy to apply to schools like Vassar, Carleton, Bennington and many others. It'll likely be a lonely experience. If the student really wants to go to a LAC, I'd choose one with a big Greek life. Something like Washington and Lee or Whitman. Or something similar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, DCUM is way out of touch with how actual college kids use the term NARP. Your post is cringey and awkward, possibly because you learned about the term from DCUM. I would avoid the term if I were you.
Without using the term, what exactly are you looking for?
I dont think it's very cringey. There's a known issue on college campuses now with 35% kids who are athletes and have a lot of their time eaten up with that. Add a whole other layer of colleges doing their best to admit gay kids (among other minority groups), you can end up with a low number of straight non-athlete males. Too complicated to go into here IMO, but it's a real issue. Don't care if you think it's cringey.
I think the gay/straight thing can be an issue (I have a trans kid so I look at these numbers), but so can specialty programs. if you have a LAC with a big architecture program, for example, those kids often are very much a group that's hard to break into. sometimes CS kids can be like this.
I'd stay away from the very small sub-2k schools.
Anonymous wrote:I think the main concern here is that the kid will only be friends with gay dudes or extreme dorks if he doesn't play a sport and I think that is a legit concern.
Anonymous wrote:I genuinely would not encourage a straight, non-athlete boy to apply to schools like Vassar, Carleton, Bennington and many others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, DCUM is way out of touch with how actual college kids use the term NARP. Your post is cringey and awkward, possibly because you learned about the term from DCUM. I would avoid the term if I were you.
Without using the term, what exactly are you looking for?
I dont think it's very cringey. There's a known issue on college campuses now with 35% kids who are athletes and have a lot of their time eaten up with that. Add a whole other layer of colleges doing their best to admit gay kids (among other minority groups), you can end up with a low number of straight non-athlete males. Too complicated to go into here IMO, but it's a real issue. Don't care if you think it's cringey.
I think the gay/straight thing can be an issue (I have a trans kid so I look at these numbers), but so can specialty programs. if you have a LAC with a big architecture program, for example, those kids often are very much a group that's hard to break into. sometimes CS kids can be like this.
I'd stay away from the very small sub-2k schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, DCUM is way out of touch with how actual college kids use the term NARP. Your post is cringey and awkward, possibly because you learned about the term from DCUM. I would avoid the term if I were you.
Without using the term, what exactly are you looking for?
I dont think it's very cringey. There's a known issue on college campuses now with 35% kids who are athletes and have a lot of their time eaten up with that. Add a whole other layer of colleges doing their best to admit gay kids (among other minority groups), you can end up with a low number of straight non-athlete males. Too complicated to go into here IMO, but it's a real issue. Don't care if you think it's cringey.
Anonymous wrote:DCUM has introduced me to the concept of NARP (non athletic regular person).
I have a NARP. A boy who isn't an athlete but also isn't into something else that has a built-in community, like Drama. Regular straight guy who likes movies and music and Ramen and video games. Super funny w strong friend group but isn't an extrovert.
He was thinking about LACs (history or possibly Econ), but I wonder if these schools have 30-40% athletes, maybe a bigger university would be better? Any thoughts?