they will forbid parking . And will forbid new single family homesAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Question for nanny staters. How do you go to Costco type places using public transit ?
It is easy to get to Costco on public transit. But I'm guessing what you are really asking is how you transport a lot of stuff on public transit. You don't. You either get things delivered or you use a Zip car/ride share or similar.
Question about what you mean by "nanny stater." You realize that this legislation REMOVES government requirements, rather than creates them, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll need to read this bill myself but this sounds discriminatory or eliteist (I’m searching for the right word). How are the people supposed to get to work, shop, visit family, go to places not accessible to metro? It does not seem like a well thought out bill. It seems like a pat yourself on the back bill.
You know how, when you're driving around in your car, and you look through your windshield, you sometimes see people out and about who aren't in cars? Have you ever asked yourself what those people are doing?
I’m not going to waste my time and make my life more difficult to avoid using a car.
Anonymous wrote:
And yet we put bus stops 300 feet apart because otherwise it's too far to walk.
The idea that, if you make parking hard, people will switch to bikes or scooters or whatever from cars is just nutty. No one is going to do that. They'll just go elsewhere. All these kinds of projects do is just change the demographics of who lives there. People with kids or who otherwise need cars go elsewhere and people who don't need cars (invariably, childless white people in their 20s and 30s) will come in.
Anonymous wrote:Simple, we will not shop there and businesses will lose business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll need to read this bill myself but this sounds discriminatory or eliteist (I’m searching for the right word). How are the people supposed to get to work, shop, visit family, go to places not accessible to metro? It does not seem like a well thought out bill. It seems like a pat yourself on the back bill.
You know how, when you're driving around in your car, and you look through your windshield, you sometimes see people out and about who aren't in cars? Have you ever asked yourself what those people are doing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll need to read this bill myself but this sounds discriminatory or eliteist (I’m searching for the right word). How are the people supposed to get to work, shop, visit family, go to places not accessible to metro? It does not seem like a well thought out bill. It seems like a pat yourself on the back bill.
You know how, when you're driving around in your car, and you look through your windshield, you sometimes see people out and about who aren't in cars? Have you ever asked yourself what those people are doing?
I’m the PP quoted and to answer your question It was very hard. I was one of those people for about 20 years of my life here in MoCo. It would take me about an hour and a half to two hours on public transportation to get to a destination. I had the time metro and bus schedules. I would have to help my parents carry groceries home. I had calluses on my hands from walking 15 to 20 minutes from the grocery store to my house carrying gallons of milk, cans and general groceries. I could go on and on about our hardships without a car and relying on public transportation but I think you’re going to dismiss my experience because it doesn’t fit your narrative. When my parents finally got a car, it was life-changing for us.
So when I’m driving around in my car and look through my windshield, I’m very thankful that I have my own transportation. My groceries are safe in the trunk, and I don’t have to wait outside in freezing, rainy, or extreme heat. And my husband scolds me for this, but when I see a woman and child waiting out in these elements, I will offer them rides.
That's very kind of you. So, on a personal level, for you, if this bill becomes law, all you will have to do in response is not move into a condo near a Metro station, if it doesn't have a parking space. And, on a policy level, the solution is not for everyone to have a car and drive it everywhere; it's for transportation and land use policies, including better public transportation, so that people don't have to have a car and drive it everywhere in order to meet their daily needs.
I have a personal question which is going to come off as trying to be rude, but I’m not. Do you personally own a car or did you grow up with a car? I know some people, I’m curious about your personal experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At new condos etc. meaning not providing parking spaces . How do people shop? Buy large items? Get away to avoid a domestic abuser? He claims it costs less to not have parking spots so costs go down. Laughable
Using transit (for example, Metro or a bus), their feet, a bike or e-bike, an e-scooter, a taxi, a ridehailing service, a rental vehicle, and/or delivery. How is this even a question?
What's more, the proposal would not forbid developers from providing parking spaces, and also would not require people to live in units without parking spaces. So if the developers were worried that people would be unable to shop without having a parking space, all they would have to do is: provide parking spaces. Similarly, if potential residents were worried that they would be unable to shop without having a parking space, all they would have to do is: not move there.
Are you seriously suggesting that the county must continue to require developers to provide parking spaces for condo units within one-half mile of a Metro or Purple Line station (a 10-minute walk) or within a quarter mile of a bus rapid transit station (a 5-minute walk), because otherwise people will be unable to escape from domestic abusers?
There are currently, right now, plenty of people in Montgomery County who don't own a car. If you don't know any, then it might be a good idea for you to get out more and meet some.
https://www.mymcmedia.org/council-considers-reducing-parking-requirements-for-new-housing/
Anonymous wrote:Question for nanny staters. How do you go to Costco type places using public transit ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Question for nanny staters. How do you go to Costco type places using public transit ?
It is easy to get to Costco on public transit. But I'm guessing what you are really asking is how you transport a lot of stuff on public transit. You don't. You either get things delivered or you use a Zip car/ride share or similar.
Question about what you mean by "nanny stater." You realize that this legislation REMOVES government requirements, rather than creates them, right?
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Question for nanny staters. How do you go to Costco type places using public transit ?
It is easy to get to Costco on public transit. But I'm guessing what you are really asking is how you transport a lot of stuff on public transit. You don't. You either get things delivered or you use a Zip car/ride share or similar.
Question about what you mean by "nanny stater." You realize that this legislation REMOVES government requirements, rather than creates them, right?
Anonymous wrote:Question for nanny staters. How do you go to Costco type places using public transit ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll need to read this bill myself but this sounds discriminatory or eliteist (I’m searching for the right word). How are the people supposed to get to work, shop, visit family, go to places not accessible to metro? It does not seem like a well thought out bill. It seems like a pat yourself on the back bill.
You know how, when you're driving around in your car, and you look through your windshield, you sometimes see people out and about who aren't in cars? Have you ever asked yourself what those people are doing?
I’m the PP quoted and to answer your question It was very hard. I was one of those people for about 20 years of my life here in MoCo. It would take me about an hour and a half to two hours on public transportation to get to a destination. I had the time metro and bus schedules. I would have to help my parents carry groceries home. I had calluses on my hands from walking 15 to 20 minutes from the grocery store to my house carrying gallons of milk, cans and general groceries. I could go on and on about our hardships without a car and relying on public transportation but I think you’re going to dismiss my experience because it doesn’t fit your narrative. When my parents finally got a car, it was life-changing for us.
So when I’m driving around in my car and look through my windshield, I’m very thankful that I have my own transportation. My groceries are safe in the trunk, and I don’t have to wait outside in freezing, rainy, or extreme heat. And my husband scolds me for this, but when I see a woman and child waiting out in these elements, I will offer them rides.
That's very kind of you. So, on a personal level, for you, if this bill becomes law, all you will have to do in response is not move into a condo near a Metro station, if it doesn't have a parking space. And, on a policy level, the solution is not for everyone to have a car and drive it everywhere; it's for transportation and land use policies, including better public transportation, so that people don't have to have a car and drive it everywhere in order to meet their daily needs.
Anonymous wrote:There’s also crime on Public transit and it will only get worse. Sure I can be carjacked but that’s also your fault