Anonymous wrote:Great timing. I am generally not 'direct' as my first play and instead do some sort of very clear hint + humor + kind smile. ie:
Direct:
"Jim, please stop stop blocking my driveway even a little bit, with your car. The law in DC is to leave a minimum 5 ft of clearance. You have plenty of room to pull up in front of your own home, so in the future, please do that."
Oblique:
"Jim, I've been having trouble navigating backing out of my driveway and I'm afraid I'm going to nick your bumper when it's close to my driveway."
IN MY experience, I get the result I want 97% of the time. Jim is more careful parking his car and I have plenty of clearance to back out.
To answer OP, the reason I don't use option #1 as my first play ..... when I'm direct like that, Jim will be very cool to me for a long time. Jim is my next door neighbor of 10 years and we watch each others' cats in a pinch. Sometimes I need to borrow a tool from Jim and I want to preserve that option rather than buy a $200 circular saw that I use once. I feel uncomfortable when Jim pulls up and pretends he doesn't see him and hurries into his house without saying "hi."
THAT is why I don't go for the 'direct' option first. To avoid discomfort for the next __ years, if possible. But if Jim fails to take the self effacing hint and I can't back out, eventually I'll move onto 'direct' if it's important.
Anonymous wrote:I am amazed at how many people here are concerned with being kind to someone who is being mean to them. Why? Once you're mean to me you don't deserve my kindness. And the people who consider being direct to be "too harsh" drive me nuts too.
I was just chatting with someone who I know casually and she said she likes me because I will always tell her the truth, which evolved into a conversation about being direct vs. nice and whether those have to be different.
Anonymous wrote:+1
Agree with OP. So many threads on here about mean girls and people wanting to know how to handle nasty people. The easiest way and most efficient is to be direct and confront them over their behavior.
Anonymous wrote:Not in all situations but there are certain situations where being direct is warranted.
For example, the poster with a friend who has a pit bull from hell who is hosting a party— why wouldn’t you be honest and tell the friend you are uncomfortable around her dog?
Generally speaking, if one is focused on the truth and their actions are led by that, being direct is the way to go! We could all benefit from more directness in our lives. I know I respond much better to straight shooters than those who *think* they are somehow being kind, conscientious, or sensitive in situations that don’t call for that. Or, as I’ve started to wonder more recently, are they afraid? And if so, why?
So long as someone has the courage to say it directly to me, and the intent is not harm, I much prefer direct talk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're an idiot.
I'd bet OP is Dutch. They pride themselves on "directness" which means letting anything spew out of their mouths because it's "honest."
This can mean anything from telling someone they are fat to talking openly about their bodily functions to being "direct" and asking for reimbursement TO THE PENNY.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's possible to be direct without being tactless.
+1. It’s all in the delivery. It’s an art.
I'm pretty direct, but not rude. DCUM is actually so weird for me because people seem to be CONSTANTLY wondering about these little micro interactions and how to handle them, like there is one perfect chord they need to strike. I have not, to date, experienced any of these horrible social repercussions people seem to fear so deeply when I've just kind of come out with it. The pitbull example, I'd just be like, "sorry, not comfortable with the dog, maybe a restaurant is better for everyone?" I wouldn't waste much time thinking about it. If they're offended, whatever, but as we saw in that saga, many felt the same way. So...win for all?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's possible to be direct without being tactless.
+1. It’s all in the delivery. It’s an art.
Anonymous wrote:It's all about conflict avoidance. Lots of people would rather be uncomfortable or afraid than to confront someone directly. I'd say it has a lot to do with how conflict was handled in their childhood and also in their intrinsic personality.