Anonymous wrote:Capital Lacrosse Club happened. It became the no doubt best club for high school in the NoVA and DC area and draws the top players from local clubs, including from Pride's very strong middle school program.
Also Stars started a high school program and YJ MA launched as well, and further diluted the NoVA talent pool for High School.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:15th bracket my mistake...but point still stands
Top 5-6 brackets were absolutely the best clubs out there (30-40 clubs). Pools 7-20 (80-ish clubs) I would argue are all closer in talent/skill and the last 7 pools are not great teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:15th bracket my mistake...but point still stands
Top 5-6 brackets were absolutely the best clubs out there (30-40 clubs). Pools 7-20 (80-ish clubs) I would argue are all closer in talent/skill and the last 7 pools are not great teams.
Anonymous wrote:15th bracket my mistake...but point still stands
Anonymous wrote:In the grand scheme of things these rankings mean little more than bragging rights, more so for parents, than the players.
But for players who are serious about playing in college it does matter who you play against. Teams can only play who they are scheduled against. When playing in lower brackets it’s critical to win those games and unfortunately do so in dominating fashion, meaning win by a lot. These are two variables (wins and goal differential) used to calculate a team’s ranking.
The third variable is strength of schedule. For a team to build their resume in this area they have to keep winning to move up into the tougher brackets. Once in the higher brackets it’s not as much about winning anymore, it’s about being competitive with the better teams you are playing against. This is the formula to building up your SoS. Play the top 20s and keep games close or win.
What is disappointing to hear about Pride is their high school team had the #2 toughest strength of schedule just several years ago. Now posters are talking about the club playing top 50 teams. What happened?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How the heck did Pride 26 go from 100 to 47? They played in the lowest brackets at all tournaments. This exemplars how inaccurate these things are.
Wow. You seem like you must be an insider on lacrosse tournaments. You're a good resource. Can you tell us how you figured out that Pride played in the LOWEST bracket (as an outsider I don't get to see bracket rankings like you) at ALL tournaments (you are totally dialed in...are you a tournament director with connections) AND MOVED UP IN THE RANKINGS!!?? Like show us empiracally how you were able to get to that conclusion. I think your analysis would be useful in letting USClublax rankings know they made a mistake. Do share and we'll help you out.
Not the PP but you are making yourself sound foolish here. Anyone paying even the slightest bit of attention knows that Pride was in lower brackets all Fall season. Granted this seems to have worked in there favor still not outrageous to point it out. Your response however seems a bit over the top. I do think Pride 2026 is a better team than last year and wish them the best.
Pride 26 went 4-0 against good competition (Coppermine, Dynasty, Impact) at President's Cup and 2-0-1 at Chesapeake Invitational (CavLax, NXT). They are ranked about where they should be (below Cap Blue and some of the other big clubs from the DMV).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How the heck did Pride 26 go from 100 to 47? They played in the lowest brackets at all tournaments. This exemplars how inaccurate these things are.
Wow. You seem like you must be an insider on lacrosse tournaments. You're a good resource. Can you tell us how you figured out that Pride played in the LOWEST bracket (as an outsider I don't get to see bracket rankings like you) at ALL tournaments (you are totally dialed in...are you a tournament director with connections) AND MOVED UP IN THE RANKINGS!!?? Like show us empiracally how you were able to get to that conclusion. I think your analysis would be useful in letting USClublax rankings know they made a mistake. Do share and we'll help you out.
Not the PP but you are making yourself sound foolish here. Anyone paying even the slightest bit of attention knows that Pride was in lower brackets all Fall season. Granted this seems to have worked in there favor still not outrageous to point it out. Your response however seems a bit over the top. I do think Pride 2026 is a better team than last year and wish them the best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How the heck did Pride 26 go from 100 to 47? They played in the lowest brackets at all tournaments. This exemplars how inaccurate these things are.
Wow. You seem like you must be an insider on lacrosse tournaments. You're a good resource. Can you tell us how you figured out that Pride played in the LOWEST bracket (as an outsider I don't get to see bracket rankings like you) at ALL tournaments (you are totally dialed in...are you a tournament director with connections) AND MOVED UP IN THE RANKINGS!!?? Like show us empiracally how you were able to get to that conclusion. I think your analysis would be useful in letting USClublax rankings know they made a mistake. Do share and we'll help you out.