Anonymous wrote:Good move on Pomona's part. Will not have any bearing whatsoever on the quality of students they accept.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course. The schools that like tests have moderate demand and moderate prices (Purdue, Bama) or high demand and high prices (MIT, CalTech). Moderate demand + high price = test optional, starting way before COVID with Bates and Chicago. Pomona definitely falls into that category. I would expect all ED schools to stay TO.
Cal tech is test blind
Anonymous wrote:]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Makes complete sense. UCs and Cal State system and Caltech are all test blind. Not even optional, but blind. They won't accept scores. I have friends in CA who say that no one takes ACT or SAT any more. Any east coast or Midwest college that brings back a requirement will see applications dry up, especially from CA. And let's face it, there aren't many families with kids left in New England. I'm guessing more colleges will go test blind to make clear to applicants that they truly won't be at a disadvantage by not sending in scores.
I don’t know of any high performing students in CA who are electing to bypass the ACT and/or SAT. Most of them apply to the top 3 UCs, sure, but they also apply to other T20 schools around the country that didn’t have Janet Napolitano go rogue on their admissions policies.
I’m sure there are plenty of HS students here who will find it wise to avoid testing. But the top students?
No way.
This. The chances of getting into UCLA or Berkeley are slim unless first gen or URM so these top performing kids have to apply to many backups both in and out of state where they still are expected to submit scores (beause they are asian american or white).
Anonymous wrote:It's an interesting shift. Ten to fifteen years ago, Pomona required SATs at an absurdly high level. They were consistently in the top 10 among all schools for highest enrolled student SAT, higher than Stanford and half of the Ivies. About 5 years ago, they weighted them less heavily with entering SAT scores expectations hitting around the top 30 institutions (but well below the top 10). Now they've decided to go test optional completely.
Swarthmore, Amherst, and Williams are only test optional until 2025.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Odd that this fact was inserted. May be irrelevant because a matter like this is usually a President/Board/Admissions decision, not faculty: "Pomona faculty voted earlier this month in support of making this policy permanent. "
Watch, in two years they will switch back like some east coast schools are doing
Not odd at all. It's to show that there is universal support for the policy, that it's not being imposed over the objections of faculty.
I think it's odd. I don't think the person who issued the press release understands how these are usually done. The faculty and say and do whatever it likes but something like this is still a Board/President decision.
]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Makes complete sense. UCs and Cal State system and Caltech are all test blind. Not even optional, but blind. They won't accept scores. I have friends in CA who say that no one takes ACT or SAT any more. Any east coast or Midwest college that brings back a requirement will see applications dry up, especially from CA. And let's face it, there aren't many families with kids left in New England. I'm guessing more colleges will go test blind to make clear to applicants that they truly won't be at a disadvantage by not sending in scores.
I don’t know of any high performing students in CA who are electing to bypass the ACT and/or SAT. Most of them apply to the top 3 UCs, sure, but they also apply to other T20 schools around the country that didn’t have Janet Napolitano go rogue on their admissions policies.
I’m sure there are plenty of HS students here who will find it wise to avoid testing. But the top students?
No way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Odd that this fact was inserted. May be irrelevant because a matter like this is usually a President/Board/Admissions decision, not faculty: "Pomona faculty voted earlier this month in support of making this policy permanent. "
Watch, in two years they will switch back like some east coast schools are doing
Not odd at all. It's to show that there is universal support for the policy, that it's not being imposed over the objections of faculty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course. The schools that like tests have moderate demand and moderate prices (Purdue, Bama) or high demand and high prices (MIT, CalTech). Moderate demand + high price = test optional, starting way before COVID with Bates and Chicago. Pomona definitely falls into that category. I would expect all ED schools to stay TO.
Cal tech is test blind
DP but Caltech is an anomaly that it’s test blind. If you look at its admissions site it very clearly states they expect you to take the hardest STEM classes your school offers and it seems like they encourage to go above and beyond if feasible. Outside of first gen students, I don’t think they’re accepting anyone who has just done Calc AB.
They may be test blind but we were told by our college counselor you need the recommendation of a professor at Caltech to be a viable candidate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course. The schools that like tests have moderate demand and moderate prices (Purdue, Bama) or high demand and high prices (MIT, CalTech). Moderate demand + high price = test optional, starting way before COVID with Bates and Chicago. Pomona definitely falls into that category. I would expect all ED schools to stay TO.
Cal tech is test blind
DP but Caltech is an anomaly that it’s test blind. If you look at its admissions site it very clearly states they expect you to take the hardest STEM classes your school offers and it seems like they encourage to go above and beyond if feasible. Outside of first gen students, I don’t think they’re accepting anyone who has just done Calc AB.
Anonymous wrote:Odd that this fact was inserted. May be irrelevant because a matter like this is usually a President/Board/Admissions decision, not faculty: "Pomona faculty voted earlier this month in support of making this policy permanent. "
Watch, in two years they will switch back like some east coast schools are doing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Makes complete sense. UCs and Cal State system and Caltech are all test blind. Not even optional, but blind. They won't accept scores. I have friends in CA who say that no one takes ACT or SAT any more. Any east coast or Midwest college that brings back a requirement will see applications dry up, especially from CA. And let's face it, there aren't many families with kids left in New England. I'm guessing more colleges will go test blind to make clear to applicants that they truly won't be at a disadvantage by not sending in scores.
I don’t know of any high performing students in CA who are electing to bypass the ACT and/or SAT. Most of them apply to the top 3 UCs, sure, but they also apply to other T20 schools around the country that didn’t have Janet Napolitano go rogue on their admissions policies.
I’m sure there are plenty of HS students here who will find it wise to avoid testing. But the top students?
No way.
Anonymous wrote:Makes complete sense. UCs and Cal State system and Caltech are all test blind. Not even optional, but blind. They won't accept scores. I have friends in CA who say that no one takes ACT or SAT any more. Any east coast or Midwest college that brings back a requirement will see applications dry up, especially from CA. And let's face it, there aren't many families with kids left in New England. I'm guessing more colleges will go test blind to make clear to applicants that they truly won't be at a disadvantage by not sending in scores.