Anonymous wrote:So the OP thinks their DD should be talking to the top team even though the are getting a lack of playing time on the second team? I gotta say I'm skeptical that the club has screwed up this bad when evaluating this player.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a parent of a second club team. Work hard Get private training. ask how to improve. Put in hours. Third team, second team, starter on the first team. Varsity at a competitive HS. But he has put in an incredible amount of work.
That works, but the quicker way is to jump clubs. It's much easier to make a top team from outside than to get promoted from within.
Anonymous wrote:As a parent of a second club team. Work hard Get private training. ask how to improve. Put in hours. Third team, second team, starter on the first team. Varsity at a competitive HS. But he has put in an incredible amount of work.
Anonymous wrote:So the OP thinks their DD should be talking to the top team even though the are getting a lack of playing time on the second team? I gotta say I'm skeptical that the club has screwed up this bad when evaluating this player.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What age group?
In my experience, kid(s) who are standing out on 2nd team would generally get invited to practice or guest with the top team. If you kid isn't a super star on 2nd and about the same level as many other players on that team, chances are there are a lot of thing for her to work on. Maybe a more honest convo with her coach to see what she needs to work on. Than thinking of switching club.
It's hard to improve without playing time. If OP's kid is young, run far away from coaches not playing the whole roster. If OP's kid is older, then they need a team that will play them
The bolded above is essentially 100% incorrect, and is the prevalent thought of many uneducated soccer parents in this area. You improve through practice, you improve through outside training, and you improve through individual time (running, ball-work, shooting, etc on your own). This is where 99% of the improvement comes from (and I would argue that formal soccer practices is the least impactful one of the three on development). Games are not for improvement - they are to apply what you've learned in a "real-life" setting. If you're not getting those opportunities to do so, I agree that you should at least consider moving to a situation where you will get those opportunities. Parents need to be realistic, however, on why their darling isn't getting the opportunity. Politics/Favorites, or skills aren't at that level? Be honest, get an independent evaluation, and then determine the proper next steps (lower team, new club, etc.).
That's the party line from a club that rosters more kids than they're allowed to dress on game day.
Nope. That's facts.
Take the kid putting in the quality training work 5/6 days a week compared to the kid showing up to subpar team practice maybe 2, 3X's a week.
The 30 to 40 minutes of game time hardly touching the ball on Saturday isn't where development takes place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get out ASAP, b/c once you are slotted on a 2nd team, you are destined to stay there unless you REALLY stand out, and it doesn't sound like your DD is destined to stand out if it's a bad team fit and she isn't getting PT.
Also, I have enrolled my kid into 2 skills clinics and they wanted to know which team she was on in order to put her into the right skill group. (Makes sense to some degree...) So, having a second team label could also impact outside training. We arrived at Futstars training, and we were automatically placed in a lower skill group and it had a newer/ less experienced coach lead the sessions. While the 1st team kids had a much better coach and were getting a lot more out of training. But yes, your kid should be challenged a lot at practice, there is where a lot of growth and development will happen. With our 2nd team games/ team, there is significantly less dedication, intensity and participation by the players and families. And if the won't bring your kid up because it will upset some other families, then it might take 2 years when rosters expand. Id try out other team practices now.
OP again. This is exactly what I am worried about. Most of the other girls on the team have been playing together for years and the families are very tight. They are all lovely and welcoming, but the coach clearly favors the players he has had for a long time, even those with clear skill deficiencies. And it seems like most of the families are content to pay $3-4k/year to have social soccer. That’s really not what I want to spend that money on.
Anonymous wrote:
So what to do? She will try out for multiple clubs this spring, including for the top team at her current club, but is it worth reaching out to the top team coach now and seeing if she can attend some of their practices over the winter? I did ask her current coach to put me in touch with the top team coach, but (shocking) that has not happened.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And it seems like most of the families are content to pay $3-4k/year to have social soccer. That’s really not what I want to spend that money on.
Speaking of the $, if you switched, wouldn't you lose that $ for the club you're already on?
PP is talking about moving for next year, so... no.
If your DD is in an age where, next year, they increase team size (e.g. 7v7 going to 9v9 or 9v9 going to 11v11), the roster sizes increase so she may stand a great chance of making a first team at current club or elsewhere. If the first team coach isn't involved at all with the non first team groups at your club and has a separate tryout for the first team, that might actually be to your DD's benefit. If he can't name all the kids in the pool it means he may not her from eve and therefore not have a much of a preconceived notion of if she's good enough or not.
Visit other clubs before the spring tryout season. That will provide you the feedback you desire. If she is first team material, then the other club(s) will let you know. and you will also have your answer if she isn't part of the top line talent. Hopefully, she will have solid days when visiting the other teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And it seems like most of the families are content to pay $3-4k/year to have social soccer. That’s really not what I want to spend that money on.
Speaking of the $, if you switched, wouldn't you lose that $ for the club you're already on?
PP is talking about moving for next year, so... no.
If your DD is in an age where, next year, they increase team size (e.g. 7v7 going to 9v9 or 9v9 going to 11v11), the roster sizes increase so she may stand a great chance of making a first team at current club or elsewhere. If the first team coach isn't involved at all with the non first team groups at your club and has a separate tryout for the first team, that might actually be to your DD's benefit. If he can't name all the kids in the pool it means he may not her from eve and therefore not have a much of a preconceived notion of if she's good enough or not.
Anonymous wrote:And it seems like most of the families are content to pay $3-4k/year to have social soccer. That’s really not what I want to spend that money on.
Speaking of the $, if you switched, wouldn't you lose that $ for the club you're already on?
And it seems like most of the families are content to pay $3-4k/year to have social soccer. That’s really not what I want to spend that money on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get out ASAP, b/c once you are slotted on a 2nd team, you are destined to stay there unless you REALLY stand out, and it doesn't sound like your DD is destined to stand out if it's a bad team fit and she isn't getting PT.
Also, I have enrolled my kid into 2 skills clinics and they wanted to know which team she was on in order to put her into the right skill group. (Makes sense to some degree...) So, having a second team label could also impact outside training. We arrived at Futstars training, and we were automatically placed in a lower skill group and it had a newer/ less experienced coach lead the sessions. While the 1st team kids had a much better coach and were getting a lot more out of training. But yes, your kid should be challenged a lot at practice, there is where a lot of growth and development will happen. With our 2nd team games/ team, there is significantly less dedication, intensity and participation by the players and families. And if the won't bring your kid up because it will upset some other families, then it might take 2 years when rosters expand. Id try out other team practices now.