Anonymous wrote:Why is it so important to Republicans to defund the tax police?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the amount budgeted for hiring additional personnel for the IRS is $80 billion.
Since we are extremely in debt (over $33 trillion), I think it is good for our lawmakers look for places to cut in order to fund more important priorities.
This seems like a no brainer to me.
+1
I'm always amazed at the hysterics Democrats engage in - for no reason.
Lol nobody is hysterical. Stop calling people hysterical just because they have different policy positions that’s you, it makes you look silly and uninformed.
Oh, ok. Then you stop calling people "silly and uninformed" just because they have different policy positions than you. It makes you look like a complete hypocrite, and also not very bright.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/10/30/house-gop-demands-irs-budget-cuts-pay-israel-aid/
They just resumed their political hostage taking. In this case: defund IRS or Israel doesn't get aid.
I think Mikey should have been on his knees praying before making this decision! Or, did the Bible tell him to start out with a shellacking on his first try?
Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/10/30/house-gop-demands-irs-budget-cuts-pay-israel-aid/
They just resumed their political hostage taking. In this case: defund IRS or Israel doesn't get aid.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/10/30/house-gop-demands-irs-budget-cuts-pay-israel-aid/
They just resumed their political hostage taking. In this case: defund IRS or Israel doesn't get aid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the amount budgeted for hiring additional personnel for the IRS is $80 billion.
Since we are extremely in debt (over $33 trillion), I think it is good for our lawmakers look for places to cut in order to fund more important priorities.
This seems like a no brainer to me.
The IRS turns a "profit" - so if you are cutting there, you are reducing the amount of income for the country. It is a really bad place to cut if you are actually concerned about fiscal issues.
Anonymous wrote:I think the amount budgeted for hiring additional personnel for the IRS is $80 billion.
Since we are extremely in debt (over $33 trillion), I think it is good for our lawmakers look for places to cut in order to fund more important priorities.
This seems like a no brainer to me.
Anonymous wrote:I think the amount budgeted for hiring additional personnel for the IRS is $80 billion.
Since we are extremely in debt (over $33 trillion), I think it is good for our lawmakers look for places to cut in order to fund more important priorities.
This seems like a no brainer to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the amount budgeted for hiring additional personnel for the IRS is $80 billion.
Since we are extremely in debt (over $33 trillion), I think it is good for our lawmakers look for places to cut in order to fund more important priorities.
This seems like a no brainer to me.
The IRS turns a "profit" - so if you are cutting there, you are reducing the amount of income for the country. It is a really bad place to cut if you are actually concerned about fiscal issues.
Anonymous wrote:I think the amount budgeted for hiring additional personnel for the IRS is $80 billion.
Since we are extremely in debt (over $33 trillion), I think it is good for our lawmakers look for places to cut in order to fund more important priorities.
This seems like a no brainer to me.
Anonymous wrote:I think the amount budgeted for hiring additional personnel for the IRS is $80 billion.
Since we are extremely in debt (over $33 trillion), I think it is good for our lawmakers look for places to cut in order to fund more important priorities.
This seems like a no brainer to me.
Anonymous wrote:I think the amount budgeted for hiring additional personnel for the IRS is $80 billion.
Since we are extremely in debt (over $33 trillion), I think it is good for our lawmakers look for places to cut in order to fund more important priorities.
This seems like a no brainer to me.