Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you shouldn’t be miffed. It’s completely understandable they’d want mother-daughter time. Plus, did you have someone to watch baby? Even more understandable that they wanted an adult outing. (Maybe they would have invited you if you had an obvious option for a sitter?)
Just to play devil's advocate for a second, after a week at home with my newborn I was going stir crazy and popped her in a sling and went all over - museums, brunches, lunches, walks, coffee meetups with friends, errands, etc. I wasn't going to leave my newborn with a sitter and she slept on me as we walked.
Anonymous wrote:OP, you shouldn’t be miffed. It’s completely understandable they’d want mother-daughter time. Plus, did you have someone to watch baby? Even more understandable that they wanted an adult outing. (Maybe they would have invited you if you had an obvious option for a sitter?)
Anonymous wrote:Wait. I totally get OP and think it is beyond rude to not ask her to join them. If I was OP I would have said no, absolutely no way does that sound fun and would have loved to get some time alone, but I am introvert and hate hosting people at my home.
Anonymous wrote:I can see this from both sides.
I can understand how if you hosted your MIL for a few days, and especially if you were on maternity leave and feeling a little tender generally, it would be hurtful to hear them go on and on about this plan and how great it was going to be and share all the details. I think probably they should have downplayed it a bit more and MIL should have just told you "I'm doing some 1:1 time with SIL this afternoon, since this is the only time I get to see her on this visit. Do you need anything before I head out with her?" Or something like that. It was rude of them to make a huge deal of it in front of you.
But I also definitely think they should of course be able to plan an outing just the two of them. They have their own relationships and with MIL living far away, may not get to spend this sort of time together this often. It was not rude for them to schedule this outing, at all, and they are under no obligation to invite you. If there's no history of excluding you more generally, I don't think it's fair for you to be upset about being excluded in this situation. Don't you think there will be times when your kids are grown when you might want to hang out 1:1 with one of them and not feel obligated to invite an in-law or someone else?
I'd just let it go. Vent a bit to your DH or to a friend outside the family, you are entitled to your feelings. But they're entitled to their time together too.
Anonymous wrote:I say this gently - you are reading too much into it.
She wanted an afternoon with her daughter. Take a look at the baby you are holding. One day, when he/she is all grown up and you live a plane ride away, you will want a few hours with just you two.
Enjoy this precious time with your little one.
Anonymous wrote: If it hurt your feelings (which it frankly shouldn't have) then you should have used your WORDS to convey that and not "acted miffed". Your MIL spent all the time with you and your kid(s) and then wanted to see her kid for a bit, without a baby tagging along to a nice lunch and museum. Is that hard to understand? No diaper changing, nothing revolving around feeding, naps, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
MIL and SIL are entitled to fun time together, OP, all the more so that their planned outing is not baby-friendly, unless your baby is older and easy.
But maybe you're hurt because MIL did nothing to help you or show gratitude when she was with you? Imposing on a young mother and not helping out is the height of rudeness.
Right on cue.... you are literally making up a reason that the MIL did something wrong to piss off DIL. so damn typical.