The is still a pro0life, neo-con zealot. She is just not MAGA, which means she couldn't get the GOP nomination and most Dems wouldn't vote for her either.

I would love a Haley-Cheney ticket (but Cheney as VP)

Votes from her family really wouldn’t impact the race. Only ones she would get.

Her policies that she pursued while at NEA are big reason why the ME is so destabilized. She needs a plane ticket to The Hague to stand trial for war crimes.

She could be Speaker of the House.

What is the point of fantasizing? She wouldn't get 1% in any primary. She lost her Wyoming primary badly in a major landslide loss. And Manchin, by all polling measures, is heading for a massive blowout defeat in WV next year.

I must admit I did love the phrase "pro forced birth". That cracked me up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other than the times where they bucked against their respective parties' positions, what makes either one of them qualified?

What made Obama qualified?

Support of the media

No

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other than the times where they bucked against their respective parties' positions, what makes either one of them qualified?

What made Obama qualified?

People liked him.

Oh, ok.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other than the times where they bucked against their respective parties' positions, what makes either one of them qualified?

What made Obama qualified?

People liked him.

Anonymous wrote:Other than the times where they bucked against their respective parties' positions, what makes either one of them qualified?

What made Obama qualified?

Anonymous wrote:Just a minute ago, Liz Cheney told Jake Tapper of CNN that she would not rule out running for President of the United States.

I'm in !

+1

She would be a good candidate if there was some sort of free-for-all, ranked choice preliminary instead of the primary system we have now. But the way things are...forget about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just because she sees reality on Trump doesn’t make her a good candidate. She’s still a republican who is anti-abortion and has issues accepting her own LGBT relatives. Absolutely not.

She’s a good candidate if she’d run as an independent for the explicit purpose of siphoning votes from Trump.

Except there’s no guarantee it would only split R votes.

Sure. Her position on the issues are not the close to the democrats positions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just because she sees reality on Trump doesn’t make her a good candidate. She’s still a republican who is anti-abortion and has issues accepting her own LGBT relatives. Absolutely not.

She’s a good candidate if she’d run as an independent for the explicit purpose of siphoning votes from Trump.

Except there’s no guarantee it would only split R votes.