Anonymous wrote:I remember reading somewhere that a highly selective school in the SF Bay area looked down on 1600. Their point was that putting time into something that is known to have limited value brings up the question - are focusing on the wrong things?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jesus. Will your kid ever be good enough for you?
+1. I’m just hoping that OP is staging a humble brag. Otherwise I feel very sorry for her child.
Anonymous wrote:Jesus. Will your kid ever be good enough for you?
Anonymous wrote:I would leave it to kid. Will taking it again cause stress, and how does you kid handle stress? What do they have to give up to prep a bit? Are they dreaming of the top top schools where most have 800 in math? I do think it could make a difference. But what is the price? Only you and your kid can assess that.
Anonymous wrote:Not a troll and kid is just intrinsically motivated….trust me , you can’t make a kid take BC Calc in 10th grade and get a 5, that’s all the kid …
And they are really involved in a number of activities - that would be the main reason not to do a 2nd try …they are pretty busy w activities
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not a troll and kid is just intrinsically motivated….trust me , you can’t make a kid take BC Calc in 10th grade and get a 5, that’s all the kid …
And they are really involved in a number of activities - that would be the main reason not to do a 2nd try …they are pretty busy w activities
If you can’t see that this is the answer, then I don’t know what else to say. Everything has a cost. Any gain in points is not worth the time lost on activities, studying and maintaining their mental health.
Anonymous wrote:Not a troll and kid is just intrinsically motivated….trust me , you can’t make a kid take BC Calc in 10th grade and get a 5, that’s all the kid …
And they are really involved in a number of activities - that would be the main reason not to do a 2nd try …they are pretty busy w activities