Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Realtor lobby is very strong, consumers need to unite.
There’s really nothing to unite against.
This angst about how agents are paid doesn’t see the forest for the trees in terms of costs associated with real estate transactions. They’re marginal, not material.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nice. No more 6% for those clowns.
The Biden Administration didn’t take any action. There’s a class action lawsuit.
My guess it’s gonna fail. The industry is very careful to make sure it doesn’t appear to collude.
Manage your expectations.
Anonymous wrote:Realtor lobby is very strong, consumers need to unite.
Anonymous wrote:The path forward is not based on a percentage
commission it’s based on hours worked at a set fee with the possibility of success bonuses tied to speed and realization of best price. Oh yes, with a price cap of about $7500.
Anonymous wrote:Nice. No more 6% for those clowns.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is very needed. Other countries don’t have realtors that take 6%. I think there’s so many ways to reform this. In my mind, buyers should have to pay for it and it shouldn’t be allowed to roll into their mortgage. After all, you can’t roll moving costs into your mortgage.
I can't read the article - behind a paywall. But the sellers should continue to pay for the realtor fees because the seller selects who to use to take pictures, list, possibly stage, etc.
With today's technology, I'm wondering if we even need buyer's agents anymore. We used to need them to even find out which homes are on the market. Now we just need one realtor to open the door. We've bought and sold multiple homes. We don't even use buyer's agents anymore. The last home we bought, we just called the seller's agent and they showed us the house and even wrote the offer for us (their preference, we've written offers ourselves).
Maybe the path forward is sellers pay 2% to one realtor? This would make it better for buyers and sellers. Less commission for the sellers to pay and it would close the gap between what buyers want to pay and what sellers want to get at settlement.
Anonymous wrote:
I realize sellers pay commission, but the price is impacted by that commission.
Anonymous wrote:The path forward is not based on a percentage
commission it’s based on hours worked at a set fee with the possibility of success bonuses tied to speed and realization of best price. Oh yes, with a price cap of about $7500.
Anonymous wrote:This is very needed. Other countries don’t have realtors that take 6%. I think there’s so many ways to reform this. In my mind, buyers should have to pay for it and it shouldn’t be allowed to roll into their mortgage. After all, you can’t roll moving costs into your mortgage.
Anonymous wrote:Ha! It was something that began under Trump. Lol:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/real-estate-brokers-pocketing-6-185119778.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABxo92bsLAG6gHZTLhJKEMs_JFwL0tpRHgNMxjqwlD2-JtpzWJLn_WTnDxZpKUdFqfRR-YPFT7Vq_zI5SFuDNDkwuNj_koex-aV4pu2PlHjAVPZcECxRadhilRnXtVyfcGY-QAb7Od9lcup7qcRFZTHv5eurWBn882WvP_pW368M
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:link? clown
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-10-16/us-realtors-lucrative-fee-system-faces-mounting-antitrust-risk?embedded-checkout=true
I assume this is what OP is referring to.
Paywall