Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Over in the AEM discussion someone mentioned that kids wouldn’t bring devices to restrooms – they would just use the device to request a hall pass.
This seems like a colossal waste of everyone’s time.
The kid needs to pee. Does he ask the teacher before requesting via device or is the teacher supposed to be monitoring yet another thing while simultaneously teaching?
Ignoring the idiocy of the above procedure, and acknowledging that any form of bathroom request likely interrupts something, then the kid heads to the restroom. We all know the issues with bringing a device. But say the AEM poster was correct and kids bring nothing, if a staff member sees them in the hall, do they check the app in real time to see if the kid actually has a pass?
I’m genuinely curious. I can see a million issues with this and none of them solve the safety issue of a non-student being in the building or the ridiculous amount of extra work needed to teach the system that Larlo and Larla shouldn’t be granted passes at the same time because they’re dating this week and might go have sex in a stairwell.
This just seems like $50k that could have been used as paper chains to create a barrier around schools with more effectiveness.
Fans of this system, what am I missing?
Imagine you have the same high school kid that is leaving for 10 to 15 minutes every class period. So… potentially missing about an hour of instruction every day.
This might help everyone figure that out more quickly. Please remember that high school teachers often have multiple preps, and typically about 165 students apiece, if you count advisories (and you should).
Anonymous wrote:Over in the AEM discussion someone mentioned that kids wouldn’t bring devices to restrooms – they would just use the device to request a hall pass.
This seems like a colossal waste of everyone’s time.
The kid needs to pee. Does he ask the teacher before requesting via device or is the teacher supposed to be monitoring yet another thing while simultaneously teaching?
Ignoring the idiocy of the above procedure, and acknowledging that any form of bathroom request likely interrupts something, then the kid heads to the restroom. We all know the issues with bringing a device. But say the AEM poster was correct and kids bring nothing, if a staff member sees them in the hall, do they check the app in real time to see if the kid actually has a pass?
I’m genuinely curious. I can see a million issues with this and none of them solve the safety issue of a non-student being in the building or the ridiculous amount of extra work needed to teach the system that Larlo and Larla shouldn’t be granted passes at the same time because they’re dating this week and might go have sex in a stairwell.
This just seems like $50k that could have been used as paper chains to create a barrier around schools with more effectiveness.
Fans of this system, what am I missing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe the teachers will have a program and logs when they leave. Or there's something in a classroom. If a student is gone for too long, it automatically alerts admin or security (hopefully the time-keeping isn't up to the teacher, as if teacher don't have enough responsibilities).
That’s what I’m talking about! This could be great.
I fell down some reddits on Minga and it has been used to discipline teachers for allowing too many kids a hall pass, too many during specific periods, allowing kids to overstay the maximum time out (it looks like some schools set a timer)... There's also some amusing TikToks from students along the lines of, "My school doesn't care if we OD, but they do care if we sh-t for more than 8 minutes." This tracks for me how employers use swipe cards, devise tracking, keyboard and screen tracking... Be careful what you wish for when it comes to monitoring software. It's not just there to monitor those crazy kids.
Anonymous wrote:Over in the AEM discussion someone mentioned that kids wouldn’t bring devices to restrooms – they would just use the device to request a hall pass.
This seems like a colossal waste of everyone’s time.
The kid needs to pee. Does he ask the teacher before requesting via device or is the teacher supposed to be monitoring yet another thing while simultaneously teaching?
Ignoring the idiocy of the above procedure, and acknowledging that any form of bathroom request likely interrupts something, then the kid heads to the restroom. We all know the issues with bringing a device. But say the AEM poster was correct and kids bring nothing, if a staff member sees them in the hall, do they check the app in real time to see if the kid actually has a pass?
I’m genuinely curious. I can see a million issues with this and none of them solve the safety issue of a non-student being in the building or the ridiculous amount of extra work needed to teach the system that Larlo and Larla shouldn’t be granted passes at the same time because they’re dating this week and might go have sex in a stairwell.
This just seems like $50k that could have been used as paper chains to create a barrier around schools with more effectiveness.
Fans of this system, what am I missing?
Anonymous wrote:That other districts use it doesn't sway me. Our students need to be less tethered to tech. If teachers are burdened in the classroom with monitoring hall passes, that needs to be examined by Spyhax. Syphax could actually be useful and figure out what the hell is going on in our schools, with staffing, and with our students. Just slapping a tech bandaid on it and calling it a day isn't going to do anything but add a layer of big brother. No solutions. Just throwing $50,000 at an app and calling it a day, which is indeed par for the course with APS.
Anonymous wrote:I'm suspicious about anything supported by the principal who came from ACHS. I'm very much against this. I don't need my kid worrying about going to the bathroom.
I fell down some reddits on Minga and it has been used to discipline teachers for allowing too many kids a hall pass, too many during specific periods, allowing kids to overstay the maximum time out (it looks like some schools set a timer)... There's also some amusing TikToks from students along the lines of, "My school doesn't care if we OD, but they do care if we sh-t for more than 8 minutes." This tracks for me how employers use swipe cards, devise tracking, keyboard and screen tracking... Be careful what you wish for when it comes to monitoring software. It's not just there to monitor those crazy kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe the teachers will have a program and logs when they leave. Or there's something in a classroom. If a student is gone for too long, it automatically alerts admin or security (hopefully the time-keeping isn't up to the teacher, as if teacher don't have enough responsibilities).
That’s what I’m talking about! This could be great.