Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like Einstein quite a bit, and I think GS is nonsense all around, including when it shows predominantly white/Asian, overwhelmingly UMC/wealthy, schools as the "winners" in some deranged competition.
With that said, there are a few ways in which Einstein seems to be doing well. Knowing that GS weights how well historically marginalized groups do compared to the state average, I looked at the "equity" section.
On almost every metric, Black, Latino, and Native American kids are outperforming the state average, sometimes by quite a bit. However, I do think MCPS is fudging the numbers a little bit here (not just at AEHS) because the metric is tracking how many kids "take" an AP or IB class, not how many kids pass the class or pass the test.
The one AEHS metric that would give me pause as a parent is the percentage of chronic absences, which is above the state average for every single demographic group.
I wonder if MCPS is now paying for AP tests for everyone (except IB students) to try and help their GS ratings by increasing participation in the exams.
Anonymous wrote:I like Einstein quite a bit, and I think GS is nonsense all around, including when it shows predominantly white/Asian, overwhelmingly UMC/wealthy, schools as the "winners" in some deranged competition.
With that said, there are a few ways in which Einstein seems to be doing well. Knowing that GS weights how well historically marginalized groups do compared to the state average, I looked at the "equity" section.
On almost every metric, Black, Latino, and Native American kids are outperforming the state average, sometimes by quite a bit. However, I do think MCPS is fudging the numbers a little bit here (not just at AEHS) because the metric is tracking how many kids "take" an AP or IB class, not how many kids pass the class or pass the test.
The one AEHS metric that would give me pause as a parent is the percentage of chronic absences, which is above the state average for every single demographic group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly who cares. GS just tells you where the higher SES areas are.
Exactly and it punishes diversity!
That’s not true. It’s weighted heavily towards academic growth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I honestly don't understand why DCUM seems to love to crap on Einstein so much. I have no idea why its GS rating increased, but I know my high achieving white kid is very happy there as are his peers, as far as I can tell.
Mine, too. From what they've said, there's a pretty sizable group of kids with high academic goals, but the atmosphere seems to be more supportive than competitive. They also love the overall creative and artsy vibe at Einstein.
I've been impressed so far with their IB teachers, too. My kid looks forward to going to class, and comes home excited about what they've learned. I guess time will tell how well they're prepared for the IB exams, but most of their classes have already started working on test-taking strategies and brainstorming for their IAs.
Anonymous wrote:I honestly don't understand why DCUM seems to love to crap on Einstein so much. I have no idea why its GS rating increased, but I know my high achieving white kid is very happy there as are his peers, as far as I can tell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I also think you need to take GS with a grain of salt, but Einstein is also our “home” school and neighbors seem to like it. Our kids are still a few years out from HS and I have no idea if the boundaries will change before then. Our neighborhood has turned over a lot in the last 15 years or so as older residents sold their houses to young families, I guess that’s partly why the school is so overcrowded now!
This is the big reason. There were a good chunk of original owners who left, moved or died and it was reasonably priced and the location is great. So, lots of families moved in. Sadly housing prices are getting absurd for what these houses are and the flippers are here building the $1 million dollar houses which are selling and bringing up the prices which impacts gs.
Anonymous wrote:I honestly don't understand why DCUM seems to love to crap on Einstein so much. I have no idea why its GS rating increased, but I know my high achieving white kid is very happy there as are his peers, as far as I can tell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly who cares. GS just tells you where the higher SES areas are.
Exactly and it punishes diversity!
That’s not true. It’s weighted heavily towards academic growth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gs ranks schools high with rapes and assaults. What does that tell you?
there are rapes and assaults in all high schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly who cares. GS just tells you where the higher SES areas are.
Exactly and it punishes diversity!