Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We'd never even consider 1st class, so to me the straight shot seems like the thing I'd choose.
Choosing 3 flights and an over night instead of 1 flight seems to make the travel take forever. But how long are the 3 flights each, vs the 1 straight shot?
With a kid that age, you don't want to make travel efficient. You want to make it low-stress. Different goals.
We just returned from a trip to Europe where our non-stop outgoing flight was cancelled. It was a scramble to get seats on another flight, and we ended up not in the premium economy we paid for. I used to be big on layovers and exploring, but given how degraded air travel is today, I would take as few flights as possible to get to my destination. Every flight increases the chances that something will go wrong.
I do think this is a really good point. I don't mind layovers with kids generally for the reasons people have stated but it really does up your risk and that should be considered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We'd never even consider 1st class, so to me the straight shot seems like the thing I'd choose.
Choosing 3 flights and an over night instead of 1 flight seems to make the travel take forever. But how long are the 3 flights each, vs the 1 straight shot?
With a kid that age, you don't want to make travel efficient. You want to make it low-stress. Different goals.
We just returned from a trip to Europe where our non-stop outgoing flight was cancelled. It was a scramble to get seats on another flight, and we ended up not in the premium economy we paid for. I used to be big on layovers and exploring, but given how degraded air travel is today, I would take as few flights as possible to get to my destination. Every flight increases the chances that something will go wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Straight shot. Boarding and unboarding and waiting to board is the worst. That's when my kids act up. While they're buckled in, with ipads, they are little angels.
Coach sucks, though. And if you can't control your kids for 20 minutes at a time...
And coach is an issue on long-haul if you want your kids to sleep. They are much more likely to sleep on the flight with lay flat seats
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We'd never even consider 1st class, so to me the straight shot seems like the thing I'd choose.
Choosing 3 flights and an over night instead of 1 flight seems to make the travel take forever. But how long are the 3 flights each, vs the 1 straight shot?
With a kid that age, you don't want to make travel efficient. You want to make it low-stress. Different goals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We'd never even consider 1st class, so to me the straight shot seems like the thing I'd choose.
Choosing 3 flights and an over night instead of 1 flight seems to make the travel take forever. But how long are the 3 flights each, vs the 1 straight shot?
With a kid that age, you don't want to make travel efficient. You want to make it low-stress. Different goals.
I'd say with a 0-3 year old my approach would be different. 4 year olds are MUCH better travelers. Small enough to sleep many places, interested in watching entire movies, can eat most food. I think efficiency absolutely plays into keeping everyone happy. Taking 2 flights, then spending the night somewhere, and then taking ANOTHER flight seems ridiculous unless you have some serious special needs.
Agree entirely with this poster. 4 year olds are so easy on planes! And Germany isn’t all that far.
So? First is always more comfortable.
For a full grown adult, the comfort of 1st is exponentially better. For a small kid, it’s easy to argue it does not make as much of a difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We'd never even consider 1st class, so to me the straight shot seems like the thing I'd choose.
Choosing 3 flights and an over night instead of 1 flight seems to make the travel take forever. But how long are the 3 flights each, vs the 1 straight shot?
With a kid that age, you don't want to make travel efficient. You want to make it low-stress. Different goals.
I'd say with a 0-3 year old my approach would be different. 4 year olds are MUCH better travelers. Small enough to sleep many places, interested in watching entire movies, can eat most food. I think efficiency absolutely plays into keeping everyone happy. Taking 2 flights, then spending the night somewhere, and then taking ANOTHER flight seems ridiculous unless you have some serious special needs.
Agree entirely with this poster. 4 year olds are so easy on planes! And Germany isn’t all that far.
So? First is always more comfortable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We'd never even consider 1st class, so to me the straight shot seems like the thing I'd choose.
Choosing 3 flights and an over night instead of 1 flight seems to make the travel take forever. But how long are the 3 flights each, vs the 1 straight shot?
With a kid that age, you don't want to make travel efficient. You want to make it low-stress. Different goals.
I'd say with a 0-3 year old my approach would be different. 4 year olds are MUCH better travelers. Small enough to sleep many places, interested in watching entire movies, can eat most food. I think efficiency absolutely plays into keeping everyone happy. Taking 2 flights, then spending the night somewhere, and then taking ANOTHER flight seems ridiculous unless you have some serious special needs.
Agree entirely with this poster. 4 year olds are so easy on planes! And Germany isn’t all that far.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We'd never even consider 1st class, so to me the straight shot seems like the thing I'd choose.
Choosing 3 flights and an over night instead of 1 flight seems to make the travel take forever. But how long are the 3 flights each, vs the 1 straight shot?
With a kid that age, you don't want to make travel efficient. You want to make it low-stress. Different goals.
I'd say with a 0-3 year old my approach would be different. 4 year olds are MUCH better travelers. Small enough to sleep many places, interested in watching entire movies, can eat most food. I think efficiency absolutely plays into keeping everyone happy. Taking 2 flights, then spending the night somewhere, and then taking ANOTHER flight seems ridiculous unless you have some serious special needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We'd never even consider 1st class, so to me the straight shot seems like the thing I'd choose.
Choosing 3 flights and an over night instead of 1 flight seems to make the travel take forever. But how long are the 3 flights each, vs the 1 straight shot?
With a kid that age, you don't want to make travel efficient. You want to make it low-stress. Different goals.