Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fundamental failure with DC charter laws is the lack of accountability. Once you have a charter, you have to be grossly incompetent to lose your charter. And the whole enrollment system is designed to keep you open, even if you are filled with kids who have you as their 13th choice or whatever. So every couple years there will be these threads about CMI that ought to alarm the right officials, and unless it's wholly mismanaged, it will still be open 20 years from now.
In the period between 2012 and 2020, 26 charter LEA schools/programs closed; 18 because of academics and 8 because of financial management.... but, yeah, no accountability.![]()
Anonymous wrote:The fundamental failure with DC charter laws is the lack of accountability. Once you have a charter, you have to be grossly incompetent to lose your charter. And the whole enrollment system is designed to keep you open, even if you are filled with kids who have you as their 13th choice or whatever. So every couple years there will be these threads about CMI that ought to alarm the right officials, and unless it's wholly mismanaged, it will still be open 20 years from now.
Anonymous wrote:No,the idea of blaming sub for student’s academic failure doesn’t stood valid. This arise questions on as how the foundation was built ? Does 3-5 months of Subs assisting the next main teacher in the class dominate such portion of child’s academic education success? This might not be fair to blame them blindly. As a parent myself, I can feel the frustration and may against the idea of getting temporary subs but this is not fair for blaming Subs for any child’s academic failure! Many factors including ourselves as a parent , school, lead teacher and system determine that!
Anonymous wrote:https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/education/dc-parents-concerned-after-students-lose-their-second-teacher-in-a-row/65-c2942f57-5636-4af2-b498-cf00abc0fa89
Anyone else see this about Creative Minds International Public Charter School? I've heard this place used to be a decent school. I have acquaintances that work there and I only hear negative things about the leadership and some of the staff. Looks like the good people that did remain are now leaving in droves. The people I know there say that the leadership is incompetent which has caused many of the qualified staff to resign (like the teachers in the article). I've heard the qualified teachers that leave are being replaced with unlicensed folks with little experience. Won't be sending my children there.
Not ideal!
Anonymous wrote:Shame on WUSA for picking up this story. It's not a unique one, just one that some privileged parent pitched. His kid is welcomed to attend Bruce Monroe.