Anonymous wrote:School should be preparing kids for adult life.
In your adult life, work or otherwise, how often do you use a book? I mean an actual bound book? When you are ingesting information for work, are you able to do it even though it isn't presented in a bound format?
I would guess rarely. And the world is increasingly not involving the printed page. I suggest that our generation's sense of discomfort, is rooted in thinking that what we did something is the "right way" to do something. I also suggest the studies on learning are influenced by the change in times. Give it a decade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are much younger, but this will bother me, especially once you hit middle school/high school. How on earth do you take a challenging AP history class without reading a textbook? I read literally my whole AP US history textbook over the course of the year in high school. And what about for reference? What happens when you can't remember all the parts of the cell in bio, do you just google it? How do you study?
Math, I can see, because we really just used ours for the math problems/homework, so if those are online or in handouts, then fine.
I guess I'm also biased because reading is how I learn best. I got a lot more out of the nightly readings than I did from class, just because of my learning style. And it's still how I learn best (I've never been a YouTube learner, though my husband uses it a lot to learn new things, like home repair). But what happens to kids who are that same way?
I think some people may be confusing a lack of a bound physical book with a lack of reading. My two kids, currently in middle school and high school have done a ton of reading. It just happens on screens (think Kindle) or in hand outs. My 11th grader has read multiple novels and AP texts through her computer.
There are a lot of advantages to this. It can be interactive. It can be edited in real time to be up to date and address anything that lacks clarity or needed context.
We can talk about whether the electronic nature of the content is somehow less optimal, or bad for the eyes or whatnot. But reading is still occurring.
Anonymous wrote:If you make the people stupid then they are easy to control. By banning books, not teaching history.
Many white people gets triggered by history. To learn history is in favor to the next generations to not copy the racist, horrible white people from before.
Anonymous wrote:My kids are much younger, but this will bother me, especially once you hit middle school/high school. How on earth do you take a challenging AP history class without reading a textbook? I read literally my whole AP US history textbook over the course of the year in high school. And what about for reference? What happens when you can't remember all the parts of the cell in bio, do you just google it? How do you study?
Math, I can see, because we really just used ours for the math problems/homework, so if those are online or in handouts, then fine.
I guess I'm also biased because reading is how I learn best. I got a lot more out of the nightly readings than I did from class, just because of my learning style. And it's still how I learn best (I've never been a YouTube learner, though my husband uses it a lot to learn new things, like home repair). But what happens to kids who are that same way?
Anonymous wrote:Is the no textbook thing in public schools or also good private schools? I.e. do private schools have less screen time? My kids haven’t started school yet so I haven’t looked into this.
Anonymous wrote:My kids are much younger, but this will bother me, especially once you hit middle school/high school. How on earth do you take a challenging AP history class without reading a textbook? I read literally my whole AP US history textbook over the course of the year in high school. And what about for reference? What happens when you can't remember all the parts of the cell in bio, do you just google it? How do you study?
Math, I can see, because we really just used ours for the math problems/homework, so if those are online or in handouts, then fine.
I guess I'm also biased because reading is how I learn best. I got a lot more out of the nightly readings than I did from class, just because of my learning style. And it's still how I learn best (I've never been a YouTube learner, though my husband uses it a lot to learn new things, like home repair). But what happens to kids who are that same way?
Anonymous wrote:There are US history textbooks being used in poorer schools that don't mention Trump being president because they're that dated. Don't you agree it's best to have up to date information?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are US history textbooks being used in poorer schools that don't mention Trump being president because they're that dated. Don't you agree it's best to have up to date information?
For history? No. My AP history class in 2000 ended with the Vietnam War. History isn’t current events, and 2016 is hardly history.