Anonymous wrote:Once he has the job, then his resume is less important. At that point, how he performs in the job is more important and rating him on his work is what matters.
If the interviewers cared about the legitimacy of his resume, they could have questioned things on the resume, could have given him some technical quizzes or questions during the interview or done background checks to investigate his background. Because we've been burned by someone who embellished their resume in the past, I make sure to have technical questions for candidates in the interview and in some cases, I will call listed references to inquire about work experience. I find it telling if there are no coworkers or supervisors who are familiar with a candidates resume and skills in their list of references and I do ask for a list of references.
Not in the federal government. You can be terminated twenty years down the road based on a fraudulent resume submitted to a federal agency when you first joined the government. This is why the federal government is reinvestigating everyone with a Public Trust clearance every 7 years - they have found all sorts of issues. Of course, they must hard proof of the deception. It causes one to fail their suitability determination.