Anonymous wrote:Because nearly all of these posts are about men who would like to offload the emotional labor of their marriage to their wives. Their wives should not have to take it all on.
It would be very rare on here to see a post from a man saying he has been given too many responsibilities to his wife’s parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure but I can't imagine my DH dealing with any sort of anything with either of my parents.
+1
And they get along just fine, no issues.
Total double standard regarding this, IMO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The other piece of this is that for me (a woman), I handle about 80% of the day to day logistics of my family's life. My inlaws are fine, but I do not need to add managing them to my already quite full plate.
In terms of balancing household labor in my own house, it has worked much better for me to have bright lines around things that are "not mine" because it absolves me of needing to take action / take care of a particular thing. This means my MIL texts both me and her son about (whatever the issue of the day is), he will respond.
My parents would never DREAM of texting my husband (I deal with them on my own), so this means that the family organizing/obligation labor is roughly equally distributed.
I’d never thought of this, but my interactions are the same way. We live far from both ILs and my parents and texting is the main form of communication used by all. My MIL always includes her son and me on texts about presents, mailings, plans etc. My mom would never think to include him on texts like that. Neither Dads make any of these plans. I tend to let my husband respond to his mom unless it’s a “did the package arrive” type question and I’m already home.
So letting my husband deal with his mom just evens it out as I’m dealing with mine.
'Anonymous wrote:I often see people respond to posts about IL issues with something along the lines of "Why are you involved at all? Let your spouse handle it."
Certainly, sometimes that is the right answer. I myself have on occasion said to my spouse, "You need to deal with your mother." But why is it that some people think it is ALWAYS the right answer?
My MIL is a person in my life. She is in my spouse's life and in my kids' lives. While she can be extraordinarily frustrating and intrusive, she is somebody that I have a relationship with, my own. Why should I not raise it with her directly if she has done something to offend/upset me? I do that with everyone else in my life.
Now, if I literally did not want to have any personal relationship with her at all, did not want her "in my life" it would make sense. But assuming I do...
Genuinely curious about this approach to ILs.
Anonymous wrote:The other piece of this is that for me (a woman), I handle about 80% of the day to day logistics of my family's life. My inlaws are fine, but I do not need to add managing them to my already quite full plate.
In terms of balancing household labor in my own house, it has worked much better for me to have bright lines around things that are "not mine" because it absolves me of needing to take action / take care of a particular thing. This means my MIL texts both me and her son about (whatever the issue of the day is), he will respond.
My parents would never DREAM of texting my husband (I deal with them on my own), so this means that the family organizing/obligation labor is roughly equally distributed.
Anonymous wrote:Small, mundane things, sure, either spouse can handle.
But for more serious issues, it's safer to let the spouse handle their own respective families. If my parents did something that DH and I didn't like, I'd rather that I address it with them than him. They may not like my pushback, but they'll always love me no matter what. If DH does the pushback, they'd be offended and alienated.