Anonymous wrote:Again, why do any of them deserve residuals? Most of us are paid for the work we do. If it’s successful after we move onto another job, we don’t get residuals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, why do any of them deserve residuals? Most of us are paid for the work we do. If it’s successful after we move onto another job, we don’t get residuals.
Residuals do not work like YOUR job's pay works. Period. No comparison.
You seem not to know that people get paid less up front on the understanding that they will then be paid residuals over time, in amounts based on things like how much a show is viewed. They are not making a big wad of cash up front and then residuals are extra goodies on top of that. Residuals are part of the compensation they're owed for the work. Imagine if your job paid you a much smaller amount up front then said, we'll pay you the rest we owe you, dribbled out in tiny checks over a long, long time, IF the thing you built is still working well for us in a year, two years, five years....That's the deal. It sucks. It benefits only the studios and streamers, who then turn around and say, "Oh, that show isn't getting many eyeballs on streaming, here's a check for 15 cents, sorry!" And 15 cents is not an exaggeration for effect, PP. Many, many residual checks are for pennies. Often that's based on streamers claiming shows aren't being watched. Guess what? Old-school "TV ratings" don't really exist for most streaming so the streamers can just make up whatever they want about a show's "success" and no one can challenge them.
This is also why some streamers have pulled shows off entirely and won't show them at all. The streamers now don't want to pay anyone involved any of the owed residuals, so they've yanked less-known shows from all streaming. Gone. Max (HBO) did this just recently. So, how would you like it if even your tiny dribble of the remainder of your pay ended completely, and you'd never see the rest of your compensation, because your old bosses stowed your work product in a vault just to avoid paying you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The studios didn't count on the public support, tbh.
My sister is in one of the striking industries and has told me so many stories of local restaurants and businesses bringing free food out to those on strike. There are also lots of places that will give out free or very deeply discounted food to those on strike who are struggling.
She said many big-time actors, writers, and directors have publicly and quietly donated funds to help those struggling to make ends meet while on strike.
My sister has picked up side work as a tutor and dog walker through a group formed to put those needing work done in touch with those on strike who need work.
I don't recall the outpouring of public support during the last strike. Probably because social media wasn't as big back then. It was around, but it wasn't as robust as now. My sister wasn't in the industry at that time, so I have no 'personal' reference, though.
But is that just in CA?
Anonymous wrote:Again, why do any of them deserve residuals? Most of us are paid for the work we do. If it’s successful after we move onto another job, we don’t get residuals.
Anonymous wrote:Again, why do any of them deserve residuals? Most of us are paid for the work we do. If it’s successful after we move onto another job, we don’t get residuals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TBH I haven’t even noticed and I doubt I am the only one. Plenty to watch on streaming. I think the strike isn’t having that big of effect so there isn’t a reason for them to take any action.
I think people haven't really noticed because it's primarily been over summer. Back in the old days that's when there were only reruns anyway, and people are traveling and happy to stream Suits or Succession or whatever show they didn't manage to watch the first time around.
Now that the fall season is here and everyone is getting back into the school/work routine, I suspect people will start to notice.
I heard a podcast yesterday with one of the writers who said there are a few fall shows that had already been completely written and handed off to the show-runner right before the strike started. But for most shows, the fall episodes are completely blown out of the water already - they should have started working on them in early summer. And with no short term end in sight, this writer was beginning to think that the entire season is just gone.
I also wonder why the actors/writers haven't called for a consumer boycott. It wouldn't be massively popular, but I do think it might be enough to catch the studio's attention. Maybe they're waiting to see how things play out once the fall season doesn't actually start.
Anonymous wrote:I read an interesting theory the other day that predicted this might be the end of the AMPTP. There are studios out there still making movies because the studios negotiated with SAG/WAG etc separately. A24 for example isn't a part of the AMPTPT so is chugging along. The streamers are what is complicating this, like Netflix is really a very different business model from Disney. At some point when the AMPTP has too diverse needs because their members need different things, then it makes more sense to break up and let producers just negotiate with actors and writers independently. Why should universal accept months of strike and a huge financial hit to help netflix continue to obfuscate streaming metrics, it just doesn't make sense.