Anonymous wrote:I don't want Potomac to turn into Little Guatemala, so no.
Anonymous wrote:Every new development has been required to include a small group of townhouses. We did our part. Now go away.
Anonymous wrote:Every new development has been required to include a small group of townhouses. We did our part. Now go away.
Anonymous wrote:Potomac has built some multi family communities In The past 20 years.
To do this You have to elect a majority of people that will attempt to do this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is plenty of room for growth off 355, CT ave, Georgia Ave, etc.
Life ain't fair.
Also in Potomac. Who said anything about fair or not fair? This is about private property rights.
Why would you WANT multi family
Properties of River or Falls Rd?
Let’s build some multi families off Glen road! Very accessible.
I don't understand why anybody would want anything off River Road or Falls Road. However, people do. If the property owner wants to build something multi-family there, the property owner should be allowed to do so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is miles of underutilized real estate along the Pike. Convenient to Metro. Infrastructure mostly built already. Retail nearby. The Pike provides a great opportunity to MF housing.
Agreed, the OP must be trolling.
I'm not the OP, but - why shouldn't it be allowed to build multi-family housing in Potomac?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is plenty of room for growth off 355, CT ave, Georgia Ave, etc.
Life ain't fair.
Also in Potomac. Who said anything about fair or not fair? This is about private property rights.
Why would you WANT multi family
Properties of River or Falls Rd?
Let’s build some multi families off Glen road! Very accessible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is plenty of room for growth off 355, CT ave, Georgia Ave, etc.
Life ain't fair.
Also in Potomac. Who said anything about fair or not fair? This is about private property rights.