Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W&M has a strong alumni network and high graduation rates. For in-state residents, the tuition is a fantastic deal. They get a private school education for a public school price.
WSJ rankings seem to be the least useful when comparing to US News or Niche.
folderol
The bolded is such nonsense; I always laugh whenever I read this. [/quote
Except it’s not. I had a kid transfer from WM to UVA. The classes and professors are far superior WM. This isn’t to say he doesn’t love UVA, but the classes are huge (even as a junior) and not nearly as engaging/in depth.
WM will always get knocked down in the rankings because it competes with large, national universities that have the capacity to do a lot more research (which, personally, I always found to be an odd metric at the undergraduate level).
In terms of ROI, it’s also a problematic metric. A number of law schools dumped USNWR over the weight given to ROI because a lot of their students go on to very prestigious internships or clerkships after law school.
100% faculty teach all W&M courses. No TAs doing it, etc. Small class sizes. 100% undergrad focus. Kids come out very prepared.
+1 In Morning Consult's research on trusted universities W&M comes in very strong. I think trust is going to be a bigger issue than these "metrics" that can be gamed or are really not terribly pertinent to people's decisions.
Anonymous wrote:USNWR has gone off the deep end on that ranking. W&M should be a top 40 school.
That said, it is time for president Rowe to go.
Anonymous wrote:At least they finally got UVA right.
Anonymous wrote:William and Mary will continue to fall down the charts
Anonymous wrote:William and Mary will continue to fall down the charts
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The WSJ rankings are really a joke. I wouldn’t use it as anything. WM is a great school, period.
+! Truly!!
It absolutely is. But the administration needs to be concerned about the rankings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W&M has a strong alumni network and high graduation rates. For in-state residents, the tuition is a fantastic deal. They get a private school education for a public school price.
WSJ rankings seem to be the least useful when comparing to US News or Niche.
folderol
The bolded is such nonsense; I always laugh whenever I read this. [/quote
Except it’s not. I had a kid transfer from WM to UVA. The classes and professors are far superior WM. This isn’t to say he doesn’t love UVA, but the classes are huge (even as a junior) and not nearly as engaging/in depth.
WM will always get knocked down in the rankings because it competes with large, national universities that have the capacity to do a lot more research (which, personally, I always found to be an odd metric at the undergraduate level).
In terms of ROI, it’s also a problematic metric. A number of law schools dumped USNWR over the weight given to ROI because a lot of their students go on to very prestigious internships or clerkships after law school.
100% faculty teach all W&M courses. No TAs doing it, etc. Small class sizes. 100% undergrad focus. Kids come out very prepared.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The WSJ rankings are really a joke. I wouldn’t use it as anything. WM is a great school, period.
+! Truly!!
Anonymous wrote:The WSJ rankings are really a joke. I wouldn’t use it as anything. WM is a great school, period.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W&M has a strong alumni network and high graduation rates. For in-state residents, the tuition is a fantastic deal. They get a private school education for a public school price.
WSJ rankings seem to be the least useful when comparing to US News or Niche.
folderol
The bolded is such nonsense; I always laugh whenever I read this. [/quote
Except it’s not. I had a kid transfer from WM to UVA. The classes and professors are far superior WM. This isn’t to say he doesn’t love UVA, but the classes are huge (even as a junior) and not nearly as engaging/in depth.
WM will always get knocked down in the rankings because it competes with large, national universities that have the capacity to do a lot more research (which, personally, I always found to be an odd metric at the undergraduate level).
In terms of ROI, it’s also a problematic metric. A number of law schools dumped USNWR over the weight given to ROI because a lot of their students go on to very prestigious internships or clerkships after law school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USNWR has gone off the deep end on that ranking. W&M should be a top 40 school.
That said, it is time for president Rowe to go.
W&M was consistently ranked in the low 30s. But due to methodology changes, places like Wisconsin have vaulted ahead of it. This is just a guess, but further changes in the methodology, like eliminating weight for class size and alumni giving — areas where W&M shines — are going to hurt it very much. I wouldn’t be surprised to see it in the upper 50s or even low 60s. Again, just a guess, but you heard it here first.
But still higher than the other VA schools