Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
NO ONE wants that much forest. That's all. All the people who would want that much land (such as my husband) want a vista, to see their property, and they want to have amenities (pool, tennis, gardens), and they do not want to have to maintain woods. Trees need maintenance otherwise they grow every which way and fall on each other and surrounding buildings. They harbor too many deer and then you go into your garden and catch Lyme disease or other tick-borne diseases. My uncle is a forest manager and deal with these things.
And since it would be VERY expensive to uproot half the trees... this is going to be a hard sell.
Lololol. Idiot city folk.
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious what the PP thinks "maintaining woods" actually entails...
lol
Anonymous wrote:This house is back on the market for a cool $470,000 more than it sold for in September 2023.
https://www.redfin.com/MD/Potomac/12720-Piney-Meetinghouse-Rd-20854/home/10607396
Anonymous wrote:
NO ONE wants that much forest. That's all. All the people who would want that much land (such as my husband) want a vista, to see their property, and they want to have amenities (pool, tennis, gardens), and they do not want to have to maintain woods. Trees need maintenance otherwise they grow every which way and fall on each other and surrounding buildings. They harbor too many deer and then you go into your garden and catch Lyme disease or other tick-borne diseases. My uncle is a forest manager and deal with these things.
And since it would be VERY expensive to uproot half the trees... this is going to be a hard sell.
Anonymous wrote:What’s the catch? Why is it so cheap?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
NO ONE wants that much forest. That's all. All the people who would want that much land (such as my husband) want a vista, to see their property, and they want to have amenities (pool, tennis, gardens), and they do not want to have to maintain woods. Trees need maintenance otherwise they grow every which way and fall on each other and surrounding buildings. They harbor too many deer and then you go into your garden and catch Lyme disease or other tick-borne diseases. My uncle is a forest manager and deal with these things.
And since it would be VERY expensive to uproot half the trees... this is going to be a hard sell.
Lololol. Idiot city folk.
I laughed at this assessment also.
Anonymous wrote:7.6 acres backs up to a few hundred acres of woods all for under one million.
I am surprised zoned for Winston Churchill, but hey even hermits kids need a good education
https://www.redfin.com/MD/Potomac/12720-Piney-Meetinghouse-Rd-20854/home/10607396
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious what the PP thinks "maintaining woods" actually entails...
lol
Anonymous wrote:
NO ONE wants that much forest. That's all. All the people who would want that much land (such as my husband) want a vista, to see their property, and they want to have amenities (pool, tennis, gardens), and they do not want to have to maintain woods. Trees need maintenance otherwise they grow every which way and fall on each other and surrounding buildings. They harbor too many deer and then you go into your garden and catch Lyme disease or other tick-borne diseases. My uncle is a forest manager and deal with these things.
And since it would be VERY expensive to uproot half the trees... this is going to be a hard sell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the catch? Why is it so cheap?
The house is a tear down. You are buying the land.
Actually has two houses. I think with almost 8 acres you can find space to build a new home without tearing down old ones
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the catch? Why is it so cheap?
The house is a tear down. You are buying the land.
Anonymous wrote:What’s the catch? Why is it so cheap?