Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You do understand you are replaceable, right?
I am not saying this to be mean but it sounds like you need the reminder.
Op here. Yes, I’m aware that I can be replaced. It will take my company quite a bit of time though. If they fired me today (which they can’t since I’m on protected leave), the soonest they could even get a posting up for my role would be 3-4 months, then another 4-6 months to actually get a replacement, if all goes well.
Though they’ve had a very hard time getting applicants to our current roles.
They're going to start now since you're not doing your job. They absolutely CAN legally hire now for your replacement and I'm sure they are.
Op here. They can hire a replacement I guess but since I’m on FMLA have to keep my role open for me until I return.
They CAN fire you (just not BECAUSE you took FMLA). They can also hire a person in your job while you're out. You are just not as protected as you think you are. Tread more carefully.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You do understand you are replaceable, right?
I am not saying this to be mean but it sounds like you need the reminder.
Op here. Yes, I’m aware that I can be replaced. It will take my company quite a bit of time though. If they fired me today (which they can’t since I’m on protected leave), the soonest they could even get a posting up for my role would be 3-4 months, then another 4-6 months to actually get a replacement, if all goes well.
Though they’ve had a very hard time getting applicants to our current roles.
They're going to start now since you're not doing your job. They absolutely CAN legally hire now for your replacement and I'm sure they are.
Op here. They can hire a replacement I guess but since I’m on FMLA have to keep my role open for me until I return.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You do understand you are replaceable, right?
I am not saying this to be mean but it sounds like you need the reminder.
Op here. Yes, I’m aware that I can be replaced. It will take my company quite a bit of time though. If they fired me today (which they can’t since I’m on protected leave), the soonest they could even get a posting up for my role would be 3-4 months, then another 4-6 months to actually get a replacement, if all goes well.
Though they’ve had a very hard time getting applicants to our current roles.
They're going to start now since you're not doing your job. They absolutely CAN legally hire now for your replacement and I'm sure they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What diseases do u have
Op here. Ones that entail hospitalization and multiple doctors signing off on my need for FMLA/STD.
Ones that required one (?) hospitalization a while ago but now you are substantially better? Get back to work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What diseases do u have
Op here. Ones that entail hospitalization and multiple doctors signing off on my need for FMLA/STD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You do understand you are replaceable, right?
I am not saying this to be mean but it sounds like you need the reminder.
Op here. Yes, I’m aware that I can be replaced. It will take my company quite a bit of time though. If they fired me today (which they can’t since I’m on protected leave), the soonest they could even get a posting up for my role would be 3-4 months, then another 4-6 months to actually get a replacement, if all goes well.
Though they’ve had a very hard time getting applicants to our current roles.
Anonymous wrote:If WFH is so great for employers why aren’t you easily finding a new job that actually wants you to WFH?
Anonymous wrote:You do understand you are replaceable, right?
I am not saying this to be mean but it sounds like you need the reminder.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve been in my job for 5 years.
Over the summer, I developed severe health problems (several infections and eventually sepsis) after being healthy my whole life and still being young (early 30s).
I repeatedly asked for accommodation to work from home as RTO approached and it was denied, despite all the documentation I had of the sepsis and from my doctors.
Due to my health issues and the lack of flexibility, I ended up taking FMLA at the recommendation of my doctor.
I am just feeling so incredibly angry though. I worked so hard in this job, and we worked from home for 3 years. If they would have just been flexible with me, I could have kept working from home but they wouldn’t.
I took FMLA and was unable to do any meaningful handover and my projects are a mess and my clients are texting me (since they are getting my auto-response on email and Skype).
It looks like I’ll end up getting paid through FMLA (through my existing leave reserves, donated leave, and STD), but I just keep coming back to this feeling of anger towards my work for being so inflexible and for not showing me any compassion or empathy. My coworkers are mad at me, I worry.
I’m even feeling slightly better but my doctors have said I should not go back to work (at least not in person) so I guess I can’t. I could have considered a shorter FMLA but I ended up putting in for the full 3 months.
Is anyone else in the same situation? It just seems like the company is acting in such a short sighted manner.
Anonymous wrote:What diseases do u have
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait, you're taking it because you're "in a rage" or because you truly cannot work in office?
You sound like a complete brat and I would want you gone even if you're hard to replace, based on your post.
Op here. Both.
It can't be "both." Either you have no choice, or you're throwing a tantrum. Clearly it's the tantrum.
Op here. Not sure how they are mutually exclusive. I am angry, and also I am sick. FMLA/STD in my situation required a lot of medical documentation. As I explained earlier, I was hospitalized multiple times this summer and had sepsis in addition to other things.