Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://moco360.media/september-october-2023-digital-edition/ starting on page 176
Interesting that Whitman did not have nearly as many Ivy acceptances as the other schools.
What's surprising is how much better RM and Blair do than these vaunted W's.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://moco360.media/september-october-2023-digital-edition/ starting on page 176
Interesting that Whitman did not have nearly as many Ivy acceptances as the other schools.
What's surprising is how much better RM and Blair do than these vaunted W's.
Why is that surprising? They each have more than 100 kids graduating who were plucked from other schools for being among the top students in the county for their respective magnets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://moco360.media/september-october-2023-digital-edition/ starting on page 176
Interesting that Whitman did not have nearly as many Ivy acceptances as the other schools.
What's surprising is how much better RM and Blair do than these vaunted W's.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guys, the data is not accurate. With just a cursory glance, I can tell you that based on three inaccuracies--one example being Whitman having no one attending University of Vermont when I know a student who started there last week. This is self-reported data, so it's not complete AND each column may get weaker and weaker with incomplete reporting by each applicant. What does come through, it seems, is that people who apply to one Ivy apply to multiple Ivies (which we knew). And certain colleges remain popular for certain high schools based on previous years' results, which we also knew.
I'm willing to bet that kids who get into elite colleges will self report.
Anonymous wrote:Guys, the data is not accurate. With just a cursory glance, I can tell you that based on three inaccuracies--one example being Whitman having no one attending University of Vermont when I know a student who started there last week. This is self-reported data, so it's not complete AND each column may get weaker and weaker with incomplete reporting by each applicant. What does come through, it seems, is that people who apply to one Ivy apply to multiple Ivies (which we knew). And certain colleges remain popular for certain high schools based on previous years' results, which we also knew.
Anonymous wrote:Guys, the data is not accurate. With just a cursory glance, I can tell you that based on three inaccuracies--one example being Whitman having no one attending University of Vermont when I know a student who started there last week. This is self-reported data, so it's not complete AND each column may get weaker and weaker with incomplete reporting by each applicant. What does come through, it seems, is that people who apply to one Ivy apply to multiple Ivies (which we knew). And certain colleges remain popular for certain high schools based on previous years' results, which we also knew.
Anonymous wrote:These lists are useless because many qualified students don't apply to schools they cannot afford to attend.
Anonymous wrote:https://moco360.media/september-october-2023-digital-edition/ starting on page 176
Interesting that Whitman did not have nearly as many Ivy acceptances as the other schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These lists are useless because many qualified students don't apply to schools they cannot afford to attend.
That is so not true. Ivies and other top colleges give better financial aid packages then many average middle of the road-priced colleges.
Anonymous wrote:While I don’t have the energy to detail why, I know from past research that these numbers are inaccurate
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These lists are useless because many qualified students don't apply to schools they cannot afford to attend.
Whitman did horrible. So did WJ. Don’t they have some of the richest families?