Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a weird “stick it to them” thing in response to you being annoyed that their free help can benefit both parties, which actually sounds like a great thing. Hormones raging, op?
Not wanting an annoying dog around for *two weeks* right before and right after one gives birth is not unreasonable, or “sticking it” to anyone. You sound like an annoying dog owner who thinks everyone loves your dog all the time.
-Dog owner who boards my dog when needed so as not to be a total nuisance to hosts
If I was offered round the clock free help with a newborn for two weeks, I’d let them bring whatever they want.
“Help” that extends their stay significantly because it is convenient and brings an annoying dog with them can stay home. That’s not “help,” that’s a nuisance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a weird “stick it to them” thing in response to you being annoyed that their free help can benefit both parties, which actually sounds like a great thing. Hormones raging, op?
Not wanting an annoying dog around for *two weeks* right before and right after one gives birth is not unreasonable, or “sticking it” to anyone. You sound like an annoying dog owner who thinks everyone loves your dog all the time.
-Dog owner who boards my dog when needed so as not to be a total nuisance to hosts
If I was offered round the clock free help with a newborn for two weeks, I’d let them bring whatever they want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a weird “stick it to them” thing in response to you being annoyed that their free help can benefit both parties, which actually sounds like a great thing. Hormones raging, op?
Not wanting an annoying dog around for *two weeks* right before and right after one gives birth is not unreasonable, or “sticking it” to anyone. You sound like an annoying dog owner who thinks everyone loves your dog all the time.
-Dog owner who boards my dog when needed so as not to be a total nuisance to hosts
If I was offered round the clock free help with a newborn for two weeks, I’d let them bring whatever they want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a weird “stick it to them” thing in response to you being annoyed that their free help can benefit both parties, which actually sounds like a great thing. Hormones raging, op?
Not wanting an annoying dog around for *two weeks* right before and right after one gives birth is not unreasonable, or “sticking it” to anyone. You sound like an annoying dog owner who thinks everyone loves your dog all the time.
-Dog owner who boards my dog when needed so as not to be a total nuisance to hosts
Anonymous wrote:Be careful. I've found with family and dogs, it's tit for tat - if I can't bring my dog to your house, then you can't bring your dog to my house. You have a history of everyone bringing their dogs when they visit each other. Are you ok with boarding your dog in future when you visit them? The ILs probably think they are doing you a favor, even though there are things in it for them, so this request might not go over well.
That said, if the dog is going to be loud and aggravate your dog (who is going through changes with a new baby at home) or stress you over the top, you are within your rights to ask that it get boarded. It's ok to state your concerns that you appreciate their help and you love the dog and normally you'd be fine with it coming, but 2 weeks of visiting might be too much for your dog and you, given that this will be an unusually stressful time for your family and everyone needs to acclimate to a new normal.
Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a weird “stick it to them” thing in response to you being annoyed that their free help can benefit both parties, which actually sounds like a great thing. Hormones raging, op?
Anonymous wrote:OP here: They are getting something in return by not having to find somewhere else to stay while their house is being worked on. They also have a good place to board their dog that they ha e used for years. My son is in school so it's not like we're asking for constant help. We need someone to be with him while we're at the hospital.
Anonymous wrote:Sounds totally reasonable. But I’d probably couch it as you feeling like it’s just too much, rather than telling them you have issues with their dog. Unless the dog won’t be welcome back ever, then I’d be honest that the dog won’t be welcome in the future.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you planning to pay for the 2 weeks boarding?
This isn’t necessary. The dog is a responsibility that the ILs took on willingly. They can’t expect to foist the expense and inconvenience on everyone else.