Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That is the target calorie intake of an 80-90 lb person. Is she just really bad at estimating calories?! Because there’s no way she’s eating that little and able to go about her day.
Don't we require 1200 calories for basic organ/body function?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I appreciate she’s truthful instead of saying “I eat whatever I want in moderation!” Which we all know is bull to look like that. [/b]
Plenty of 50 year olds can eat whatever they want in moderation and be 5’9” and 137 lbs.
It depends what you want. I want chocolate dipped cookies and pizza and coconut cream curry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow. Granted I’m 10 years younger but I eat twice that a day and much thinner.
“Much thinner”? I doubt it since to be “much thinner” you’d have to be dead.
Nah, I hover around 120 which is just the way I’ve always been, even after 4 kids. But 17lbs is a big difference on a small frame.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow. Granted I’m 10 years younger but I eat twice that a day and much thinner.
“Much thinner”? I doubt it since to be “much thinner” you’d have to be dead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I appreciate she’s truthful instead of saying “I eat whatever I want in moderation!” Which we all know is bull to look like that.
Plenty of 50 year olds can eat whatever they want in moderation and be 5’9” and 137 lbs.
Anonymous wrote:That is the target calorie intake of an 80-90 lb person. Is she just really bad at estimating calories?! Because there’s no way she’s eating that little and able to go about her day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow. Granted I’m 10 years younger but I eat twice that a day and much thinner.
Look it’s an eating disorder contest.