Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My friend - very good looking, good career, good income, condo, family of origin is functional/intact/rich/connected and has siblings who are rich/connected/helpful/generous.
Her DH is ok looking, has a mediocre career, makes less money than my friend, comes from a broken family, no siblings, does not have property, family is MC.
So you're saying your friend is not a catch?
Of course she is a HUGE catch for any man. But, she ended up with a man who is mediocre for her because she had to settle at her age.
Anonymous wrote:Yes to a man over 40.
Anonymous wrote:Can I as a 36 year old childless woman ever be considered a catch? What would my attributes have to be?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My friend - very good looking, good career, good income, condo, family of origin is functional/intact/rich/connected and has siblings who are rich/connected/helpful/generous.
Her DH is ok looking, has a mediocre career, makes less money than my friend, comes from a broken family, no siblings, does not have property, family is MC.
So you're saying your friend is not a catch?
Anonymous wrote:You’d be a catch to a man who is either divorced and done with having children or doesn’t want kids. It takes the kid conversations off the table which would be a relief to some men.
Anonymous wrote:My friend - very good looking, good career, good income, condo, family of origin is functional/intact/rich/connected and has siblings who are rich/connected/helpful/generous.
Her DH is ok looking, has a mediocre career, makes less money than my friend, comes from a broken family, no siblings, does not have property, family is MC.
Anonymous wrote:Of course. Look at Amal and George Clooney.