Anonymous wrote:It’s Cathedral Heights. But walk two blocks east and you are in Cleveland park.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:According to the Rosedale map of who is Cleveland Park-y enough to join the dog membership waitlist, 38th St is Cleveland Park. But this house is a block south of the boundary (they cut it off at Woodley Rd).
https://www.rosedaleconservancy.org/dog-registration/
Rosedale is so pretentious! Also I can’t believe they cut the Kennedy Warren out of their definition of Cleveland Park.
Anonymous wrote:They list whatever is on the property record. Ours DC record says Wakefield and no one has ever hear of it, but that is what the listing said when we bought the house.
Anonymous wrote:According to the Rosedale map of who is Cleveland Park-y enough to join the dog membership waitlist, 38th St is Cleveland Park. But this house is a block south of the boundary (they cut it off at Woodley Rd).
https://www.rosedaleconservancy.org/dog-registration/
Anonymous wrote:They list whatever is on the property record.
Anonymous wrote:still a very nice location
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s Cathedral Heights. But walk two blocks east and you are in Cleveland park.
Bingo. I don't get why agents feel they need to lie about this sort of thing. It's an obvious lie, and Cathedral Heights is also a very attractive area.
Public records states it is in Cleveland Park.
But it's not in the historic district which IS the heart of Cleveland Park. Bad use of hyperbole. But maybe buyers won't care if it means they aren't beholden to the restrictions of the historic district.
Who cares.
Lying to buyers is bad?
Completely does not matter in this case. Anyone who wants to buy the house will look on a map or, gee, maybe go to the house and see it in person, and they'll realize it's not in Cleveland Park. Either they won't want to buy the house anymore, or they will. Worst case for the agent, they'll start to question all the other stuff in the listing. But why do the rest of us care about this at all?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s Cathedral Heights. But walk two blocks east and you are in Cleveland park.
Bingo. I don't get why agents feel they need to lie about this sort of thing. It's an obvious lie, and Cathedral Heights is also a very attractive area.
Public records states it is in Cleveland Park.
Huh? There is no "public record" assigning houses in DC to specific neighborhoods. The closest we have are historic districts, and this definitely isn't in the Cleveland Park district.
Yes there is such a database. Look up this address in the office of tax and revenue real property database and it lists the neighborhood at Cleveland Park
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s Cathedral Heights. But walk two blocks east and you are in Cleveland park.
Bingo. I don't get why agents feel they need to lie about this sort of thing. It's an obvious lie, and Cathedral Heights is also a very attractive area.
Public records states it is in Cleveland Park.
Huh? There is no "public record" assigning houses in DC to specific neighborhoods. The closest we have are historic districts, and this definitely isn't in the Cleveland Park district.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s Cathedral Heights. But walk two blocks east and you are in Cleveland park.
Bingo. I don't get why agents feel they need to lie about this sort of thing. It's an obvious lie, and Cathedral Heights is also a very attractive area.
Public records states it is in Cleveland Park.
But it's not in the historic district which IS the heart of Cleveland Park. Bad use of hyperbole. But maybe buyers won't care if it means they aren't beholden to the restrictions of the historic district.
Who cares.
Lying to buyers is bad?