Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Purchased for 69k in 1969? Now worth at least 1.2m? (1.5m is overpriced)
Where was I in 1969?
Ha, I am the OP and that's about what my parents paid, also in 1969. They still live there.
Your parents are in to 69, cool
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Purchased for 69k in 1969? Now worth at least 1.2m? (1.5m is overpriced)
Where was I in 1969?
Ha, I am the OP and that's about what my parents paid, also in 1969. They still live there.
Anonymous wrote:Purchased for 69k in 1969? Now worth at least 1.2m? (1.5m is overpriced)
Where was I in 1969?
Anonymous wrote:This home is massive. I would not take any walls down. I think the photos are deceiving of the layout. Yes, upgrades are needed but it is very reasonably priced. Will go for 1.8 or more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real issue it is Wooten not Churchill
Right. Because you're kid going to Wooton instead of Churchill is going to keep them out of the Ivy you were hoping they'd get into. What a dumb thing to say or even think. Wooton is a great school!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real issue it is Wooten not Churchill
Right. Because you're kid going to Wooton instead of Churchill is going to keep them out of the Ivy you were hoping they'd get into. What a dumb thing to say or even think. Wooton is a great school!
Anonymous wrote:The real issue it is Wooten not Churchill
Anonymous wrote:Purchased for 69k in 1969? Now worth at least 1.2m? (1.5m is overpriced)
Where was I in 1969?