Anonymous wrote:Interesting since this book seems to disprove that.
https://www.amazon.com/Our-Kids-American-Dream-Crisis/dp/1476769907/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1J3PN0HOGDN4C&keywords=our+kids+the+american+dream+in+crisis&qid=1691713856&sprefix=our+kids%2Caps%2C180&sr=8-1
Social mobility is very low in Ohio.
Anonymous wrote:These are some of the whitest places in the whole country, so of course there are fewer people being held back unfairly.
Anonymous wrote:It probably is unpopular to say this but there's a big overlap between cultural homogeneity and high levels of social trust and willingness to share together for the common good. Diverse areas have incredibly low levels of social trust and people don't and refuse to think in terms of the common good. When I speak homogenous, I do not mean white versus everyone else. But a dominant culture. Japan is a perfect example. Bhutan is another one. Various European countries are great examples, although other European countries are also struggling with declining social trust and faith in a common shared good emerging with growing diversity.
I'm just being pragmatic about it. I know enough of history that there is definitely truth to it.
Anonymous wrote:It probably is unpopular to say this but there's a big overlap between cultural homogeneity and high levels of social trust and willingness to share together for the common good. Diverse areas have incredibly low levels of social trust and people don't and refuse to think in terms of the common good. When I speak homogenous, I do not mean white versus everyone else. But a dominant culture. Japan is a perfect example. Bhutan is another one. Various European countries are great examples, although other European countries are also struggling with declining social trust and faith in a common shared good emerging with growing diversity.
I'm just being pragmatic about it. I know enough of history that there is definitely truth to it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a place for people who don’t require much from the world. They are happier with less. Doesn’t make them less, it is just a difference. I come from there. I wouldn’t go back for all the money in the world. Who wants to live longer in Iowa?
I’ve been to Iowa several times and often thought that, apart from the cold winters, one of the university towns there like Ames or Iowa City would be a great place to live or retire.
Anonymous wrote:It’s a place for people who don’t require much from the world. They are happier with less. Doesn’t make them less, it is just a difference. I come from there. I wouldn’t go back for all the money in the world. Who wants to live longer in Iowa?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting since this book seems to disprove that.
https://www.amazon.com/Our-Kids-American-Dream-Crisis/dp/1476769907/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1J3PN0HOGDN4C&keywords=our+kids+the+american+dream+in+crisis&qid=1691713856&sprefix=our+kids%2Caps%2C180&sr=8-1
Social mobility is very low in Ohio.
Ohio is NOT the Upper Midwest 🙄
Anonymous wrote:Interesting since this book seems to disprove that.
https://www.amazon.com/Our-Kids-American-Dream-Crisis/dp/1476769907/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1J3PN0HOGDN4C&keywords=our+kids+the+american+dream+in+crisis&qid=1691713856&sprefix=our+kids%2Caps%2C180&sr=8-1
Social mobility is very low in Ohio.
Anonymous wrote:“The lesson is that people seem to thrive—not always in high salaries but in health and life chances—when inequality is low; when landownership is widespread; when social connection is high; and when corruption and violence are rare. The social leveling that is characteristic of communities in the upper Midwest is more than just a quaint cultural feature. It is the foundation of a community’s well-being. Until these regions’ virtues are shared nationwide, poverty and disadvantage will continue to haunt America.”
This is chilling. There are a lot of dog whistles in here.