Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The man is the kid's Dad. He is entitled to be with his kids as much as you are.
This x 1000. What if he said 2 weeks is too long for the kids to be away from him, when you have them?
No one would have them for 2 weeks in a row. The rule would apply to both. We’re talking just about vacation time in summer, not regular custody (which is 50-50).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The man is the kid's Dad. He is entitled to be with his kids as much as you are.
This x 1000. What if he said 2 weeks is too long for the kids to be away from him, when you have them?
No one would have them for 2 weeks in a row. The rule would apply to both. We’re talking just about vacation time in summer, not regular custody (which is 50-50).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The man is the kid's Dad. He is entitled to be with his kids as much as you are.
This x 1000. What if he said 2 weeks is too long for the kids to be away from him, when you have them?
Anonymous wrote:The man is the kid's Dad. He is entitled to be with his kids as much as you are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s standard in terms of consecutive time away from the other parent for younger kids, 6 and 9? My soon to be ex will likely want two consecutive weeks in summer but I think this is too long for my youngest to be away from me.
Then, don’t get divorced. The man is your children’s father. He’s entitled to two weeks of them just as much as you are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two weeks is reasonable for older kids. You’ll want the extra time if you decide to take teenagers abroad.
Non-consecutive until age 10 or 12 is also reasonable.
One thing to consider is if you are alternating weeks in the summer, you don’t want your kids with the other parent for three weeks straight (vacation 1, vacation 2, regular schedule), so put language in there that the non-vacationing parent gets week 3, and the pattern resets from there.
Waiting to allow Dad to have visits till 10-12 screams you are trying to cut the other parent out as kids need time to have an equal bond with their other parent and by only having them see their other parent a few times a month is not bonding and by the time the kids hit 10-12 you will scream they have friends, activities, etc. and they don't have time to see dad for more than an hour or two a few times a month.
Anonymous wrote:Two weeks is reasonable for older kids. You’ll want the extra time if you decide to take teenagers abroad.
Non-consecutive until age 10 or 12 is also reasonable.
One thing to consider is if you are alternating weeks in the summer, you don’t want your kids with the other parent for three weeks straight (vacation 1, vacation 2, regular schedule), so put language in there that the non-vacationing parent gets week 3, and the pattern resets from there.
Anonymous wrote:I agree with the people on the other thread that in your specific situation I wouldn’t let my child out of the country with him.
But I think 2 weeks is fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How much does he see them now?
We are 50/50 on custody. I’m talking about vacation time only, and how it’s arranged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How much does he see them now?
We are 50/50 on custody. I’m talking about vacation time only, and how it’s arranged.
I get that, but I think the fact that they have spent the night with him before is relevant.
I am the PP with the ex across the country so I do think that how well the kid knows Dad is relavent.