Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess I associate it with “keeping up with the Joneses,” and general superficiality. Not sure if that’s what the term was meant to mean.
+1
Old money doesn't care about keeping up with the Jonses. They typically just do their thing and half the things they do others don't understand. Like we never buy luxury cars and keep an old chevy pick up for yard/pets etc, yet we have 3 homes handed down via trust. Oh, and right now I have my Birkenstocks with socks, and 2 ct diamond earrings. It just doesn't make sense to some and literally I don't care.
Well, you are the cheap and trashy old money American. The European old money are very classy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess I associate it with “keeping up with the Joneses,” and general superficiality. Not sure if that’s what the term was meant to mean.
+1
Old money doesn't care about keeping up with the Jonses. They typically just do their thing and half the things they do others don't understand. Like we never buy luxury cars and keep an old chevy pick up for yard/pets etc, yet we have 3 homes handed down via trust. Oh, and right now I have my Birkenstocks with socks, and 2 ct diamond earrings. It just doesn't make sense to some and literally I don't care.
Anonymous wrote:What I despise about strivers is not earnest self-improvement or success of those who were less fortunate. It's the thinly veiled social climbing. Trying to become "friends" with someone not because of who they are, but because of their wealth, connections, and/or status. Someone close to me was once at a cocktail party being thrown for the new CEO of a well-known local institution. The wife of the CEO began a conversation with this person. Once it was clear that she was a SAHM, the wife literally walked away from the conversation. It was clear that she was only interested in speaking with those who could be to her "social advantage", not knowing at the time that this SAHM happened to be involved in a number of influential organizations, but just didn't advertise it. It's this lack of grace, naked ambition and treating people as a means to an end in connection with their social climbing that I associate with strivers.
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s more disdain for people who come off as try-hards. They want to do all they can to come off a certain way and fit in socially and it seems desperate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess I associate it with “keeping up with the Joneses,” and general superficiality. Not sure if that’s what the term was meant to mean.
+1
Old money doesn't care about keeping up with the Jonses. They typically just do their thing and half the things they do others don't understand. Like we never buy luxury cars and keep an old chevy pick up for yard/pets etc, yet we have 3 homes handed down via trust. Oh, and right now I have my Birkenstocks with socks, and 2 ct diamond earrings. It just doesn't make sense to some and literally I don't care.
Anonymous wrote:For the same reason that kids today make fun of “pick me’s”. They are often too much, too single focused, too only caring about the next promotion/pay raise, so they can loudly proclaim to everyone always. To use another DCUM hated word, they are tacky.
No one hates or mocks the bootstrap person, hell America is built on the story of the bootstrapper. They hate the person who has nothing else to talk about, and is so socially awkward to think that’s all other people want to hear about.
Act like you’ve been there before.
Anonymous wrote:I guess I associate it with “keeping up with the Joneses,” and general superficiality. Not sure if that’s what the term was meant to mean.