Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s always best to behave with maturity instead of reading someone the riot act over some imagined slight.
OP here. I'm not talking about "reading the riot act." I'm talking about being blunt versus being polite. Like saying "nope, can't talk, and I need you to move" to the person in the kitchen, instead of saying "oh I'd love to chat about this but I'm actually in the middle of something, would you mind moving to the other side of the island so I can pull those eggs before they're overcooked?"
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I think people are misunderstanding my question. I am not talking about "getting in a tizzy" or "reading the riot act." I'm not talking about being angry or rude. I'm asking what degree of politeness you think these situations obligate you to have. How gently and politely do you need to be when letting someone know they are being rude or inconsiderate?
In other words, I would assume some level of tact and politeness as a civil person (I'm not going to swear at someone or call them names or shout at them, etc.) but there are degrees of politeness.
For instance, in the kitchen example, say this person has come into the kitchen, planted themselves in between two work stations that you need to be accessing to keep something from burning and also preparing an ingredient that needs to be added shortly, and then they ask you a friendly question totally unrelated to what you are doing. Normally I'd consider it impolite to ignore a question or an invitation to make conversation, but in that situation I think they are actually being rude (unintentionally, by failing to read the situation and understand it's not a good time to chat), so I might be more curt "sorry, can't talk about this now, and can I get behind you I need to pull those." It's not polite but I don't think it's rude or mean -- just direct. But some people seem to need a lot more than that and will get upset by that.
So my question was broadly, how much do you need to work at protecting the feelings of someone whose being unwittingly rude. I guess I land on the side of "not that much" but it seems like some people think you need to be very tactful in these situations. I was curious how others viewed it, but I think people have misread my question to assume I'm yelling at people or having dramatic confrontations, when I'm just being direct about the fact that they've misstepped in some way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s always best to behave with maturity instead of reading someone the riot act over some imagined slight.
OP here. I'm not talking about "reading the riot act." I'm talking about being blunt versus being polite. Like saying "nope, can't talk, and I need you to move" to the person in the kitchen, instead of saying "oh I'd love to chat about this but I'm actually in the middle of something, would you mind moving to the other side of the island so I can pull those eggs before they're overcooked?"
No, just be a normal adult and say “Hey, can you move over, I need to get this in the oven” instead of being weirdly hostile to your guests.
I think it's more about op's emotional regulation than the words used. Even saying "excuse me" when you're tightly wound will sound unnecessarily offensive while "get out of the way!" when in a good mood could even be ok among friends
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s always best to behave with maturity instead of reading someone the riot act over some imagined slight.
OP here. I'm not talking about "reading the riot act." I'm talking about being blunt versus being polite. Like saying "nope, can't talk, and I need you to move" to the person in the kitchen, instead of saying "oh I'd love to chat about this but I'm actually in the middle of something, would you mind moving to the other side of the island so I can pull those eggs before they're overcooked?"
No, just be a normal adult and say “Hey, can you move over, I need to get this in the oven” instead of being weirdly hostile to your guests.
Anonymous wrote:You sound like a huge pain. Do you have any friends? I would let all of these things go! There is no need to be a jerk!
1) can I squeeze past you? Gotta get the quiche in the oven!
2) say nothing! Evaluate why you do X and if you should stop
3) let it go! Enjoy the free plants!
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't address any of those, they're really not a big deal.
Anonymous wrote:Assume the person has no idea whatsoever that their behavior is rude or inconsiderate, so your response will be their first indication that their behavior is a problem. Examples:
1) You are in the kitchen, preparing a meal for other people and tidying up. An adult family member comes in the kitchen to do something unrelated to the meal and is getting in your way, disrupting a time-sensitive cooking schedule.
2) While out with a group of friends, one of them starts joking about "people who do X," not realizing you are a person who does X.
3) A neighbor who has located climbing plants along a shared fence, that regularly come over, under, and through the fence, necessitating you to frequently have to cut them back. The neighbor likely understands the climbing plants make their way into your yard, but they are totally oblivious to the idea that it bothers you, as it would not bother them.
Are you obligated to be polite when you inform these people that their behavior is offensive or inconsiderate to you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s always best to behave with maturity instead of reading someone the riot act over some imagined slight.
OP here. I'm not talking about "reading the riot act." I'm talking about being blunt versus being polite. Like saying "nope, can't talk, and I need you to move" to the person in the kitchen, instead of saying "oh I'd love to chat about this but I'm actually in the middle of something, would you mind moving to the other side of the island so I can pull those eggs before they're overcooked?"