Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My SIL had BOTH her kids after 35 (38 and 43) and both came out with zero defects or delays. The two people I know whose babies had Downs were under 35 when their kids were born.
While it is commendable that your SIL had healthy children after the age of 35, it is important to note that individual anecdotes cannot be used to make generalizations or dismiss the potential risks associated with advanced maternal age. Here are some statistics and information to refute the statement and highlight the dangers of spreading misinformation:
1. Increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities: Advanced maternal age, typically defined as 35 years and older, is associated with a higher risk of chromosomal abnormalities in babies. For example, the risk of Down syndrome significantly increases with maternal age. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the risk of having a baby with Down syndrome at age 35 is about 1 in 350, while at age 40, it increases to about 1 in 100, and by age 45, it becomes approximately 1 in 30.
2. Risk of other genetic disorders: Advanced maternal age also increases the risk of other genetic disorders, such as trisomy 18 and trisomy 13. These conditions can lead to severe developmental delays, intellectual disabilities, and various physical abnormalities.
3. Health complications for the mother: Pregnancy after the age of 35 carries higher risks for the mother as well. Women of advanced maternal age have an increased likelihood of developing gestational diabetes, high blood pressure, and other pregnancy-related complications. These conditions can have long-term health consequences for both the mother and the baby.
4. Statistical evidence: While anecdotes can be compelling, it is crucial to rely on broader statistical evidence to assess risks accurately. Large-scale studies and data analysis consistently demonstrate an association between advanced maternal age and an increased likelihood of chromosomal abnormalities and other pregnancy complications.
5. Consultation with healthcare professionals: When it comes to matters of pregnancy and reproductive health, it is always advisable to consult with healthcare professionals who can provide evidence-based information tailored to individual circumstances. They can assess personal risk factors, provide appropriate prenatal testing options, and offer guidance based on the most up-to-date medical knowledge.
It is essential to stop spreading dangerous information that downplays the potential risks associated with advanced maternal age. By relying on accurate statistics and seeking reliable medical advice, individuals can make informed decisions about their reproductive health and better understand the potential challenges they may face.
Wow you know OPs chance of having a baby with Down Syndrome is 1 in 400. Also, do you know people with Down Syndrome generally live fairly "normal" lives until they get early on set Alzheimers in their 50s, so perhaps this concern for siblings is over blown. The fear mongering of Down Syndrome and the selfishness of people who will not have supposedly perfect kids is astonishing. You know you all have a 1 in 34 chance of having a child with Autism today - can we screen to kill all of these kids too asap?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My SIL had BOTH her kids after 35 (38 and 43) and both came out with zero defects or delays. The two people I know whose babies had Downs were under 35 when their kids were born.
While it is commendable that your SIL had healthy children after the age of 35, it is important to note that individual anecdotes cannot be used to make generalizations or dismiss the potential risks associated with advanced maternal age. Here are some statistics and information to refute the statement and highlight the dangers of spreading misinformation:
1. Increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities: Advanced maternal age, typically defined as 35 years and older, is associated with a higher risk of chromosomal abnormalities in babies. For example, the risk of Down syndrome significantly increases with maternal age. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the risk of having a baby with Down syndrome at age 35 is about 1 in 350, while at age 40, it increases to about 1 in 100, and by age 45, it becomes approximately 1 in 30.
2. Risk of other genetic disorders: Advanced maternal age also increases the risk of other genetic disorders, such as trisomy 18 and trisomy 13. These conditions can lead to severe developmental delays, intellectual disabilities, and various physical abnormalities.
3. Health complications for the mother: Pregnancy after the age of 35 carries higher risks for the mother as well. Women of advanced maternal age have an increased likelihood of developing gestational diabetes, high blood pressure, and other pregnancy-related complications. These conditions can have long-term health consequences for both the mother and the baby.
4. Statistical evidence: While anecdotes can be compelling, it is crucial to rely on broader statistical evidence to assess risks accurately. Large-scale studies and data analysis consistently demonstrate an association between advanced maternal age and an increased likelihood of chromosomal abnormalities and other pregnancy complications.
5. Consultation with healthcare professionals: When it comes to matters of pregnancy and reproductive health, it is always advisable to consult with healthcare professionals who can provide evidence-based information tailored to individual circumstances. They can assess personal risk factors, provide appropriate prenatal testing options, and offer guidance based on the most up-to-date medical knowledge.
It is essential to stop spreading dangerous information that downplays the potential risks associated with advanced maternal age. By relying on accurate statistics and seeking reliable medical advice, individuals can make informed decisions about their reproductive health and better understand the potential challenges they may face.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Be concerned and monitor closely don't listen to the people on here they think they can defy science
this isn't defying science - the women of yesteryear who had 12+ children were all having children past 35. you have no idea WHAT you are talking about.
It is important to address the issue of misinformation and emphasize the potential dangers associated with women having children past the age of 35. Here is a strong refutation, supported by statistics, to discourage the spread of misinformation:
It is imperative to stop spreading misinformation and instead rely on scientific evidence and expert advice when discussing matters of reproductive health. Dismissing the risks associated with advanced maternal age is not only irresponsible but also potentially harmful. Allow me to provide you with compelling statistics that highlight the dangers of women having children past the age of 35:
1. Increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities: Scientific research consistently shows that the risk of chromosomal abnormalities, such as Down syndrome, significantly increases with maternal age. According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the risk of Down syndrome at age 35 is about 1 in 200, while at age 40, it becomes approximately 1 in 100, and by age 45, it rises to about 1 in 30. These statistics clearly demonstrate the substantial escalation in risk as women age.
2. Higher risk of pregnancy complications: Advanced maternal age is associated with a higher likelihood of experiencing various pregnancy complications. According to a study published in the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, women aged 35 and older have an increased risk of gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, placenta previa, and premature birth. These complications can pose serious health risks to both the mother and the baby.
3. Decreased fertility and increased miscarriage risk: Women in their late 30s and beyond experience a decline in fertility. The ACOG reports that after the age of 35, a woman's chances of getting pregnant each month decrease significantly. Additionally, the risk of miscarriage also rises with advancing maternal age. According to a study published in the journal Fertility and Sterility, women aged 35-39 have a 20% chance of miscarriage, which increases to 35% for women aged 40-44.
4. Increased likelihood of pregnancy interventions: Advanced maternal age often necessitates additional medical interventions during pregnancy. Women over 35 are more likely to require assisted reproductive technologies, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), to achieve pregnancy. These interventions can be physically and emotionally taxing, as well as financially burdensome.
By spreading misinformation, you are disregarding the well-established scientific knowledge and putting women and their potential children at risk. It is crucial to prioritize evidence-based information and encourage individuals to consult healthcare professionals who can provide accurate guidance based on each person's unique circumstances.
I implore you to stop spreading dangerous misinformation and instead advocate for responsible and informed discussions that prioritize the health and well-being of women and their children. Science offers us invaluable insights that should guide our decisions and actions for the betterment of society as a whole.
nothing you said contradicts or adds insight to what i said.
every woman descends from a female ancestor who had 12+ kids. having a kid at 35+ is extremely NORMAL and you are not contributing anything anyone doesn't know to this conversation.
Anonymous wrote:… avoid alcohol. Even small amounts can cause issues.
Anonymous wrote:I have two beautiful children that I had at ages 31 and 33. I am 35 now and my husband and I are arguing over whether to have a third. I desperately want one more, but he leans no (with the door still open enough to give me hope), and one of his reasons is that he's so worried about the risk of a baby with something wrong with it (chromosomal, special needs, birth defect etc). He says it's a prospect he can't even bear, especially because of how unfair that would be to the older two.
I would like to give him data or reassurance, but I can't deny that the fear seeps into me, too, not to mention how guilty I'd feel if something did happen after he was so open about his fear.
Can anyone share resources for this, or know off-hand what the general risks would be? By the time this baby would be born we would be 36 (almost 37) and 37 (DH). We have no family history of health issues. We did genetic testing and are clear. We have two healthy, full term, normal weight babies with healthy noneventful pregnancies.
Thank you!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Be concerned and monitor closely don't listen to the people on here they think they can defy science
this isn't defying science - the women of yesteryear who had 12+ children were all having children past 35. you have no idea WHAT you are talking about.
It is important to address the issue of misinformation and emphasize the potential dangers associated with women having children past the age of 35. Here is a strong refutation, supported by statistics, to discourage the spread of misinformation:
It is imperative to stop spreading misinformation and instead rely on scientific evidence and expert advice when discussing matters of reproductive health. Dismissing the risks associated with advanced maternal age is not only irresponsible but also potentially harmful. Allow me to provide you with compelling statistics that highlight the dangers of women having children past the age of 35:
1. Increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities: Scientific research consistently shows that the risk of chromosomal abnormalities, such as Down syndrome, significantly increases with maternal age. According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the risk of Down syndrome at age 35 is about 1 in 200, while at age 40, it becomes approximately 1 in 100, and by age 45, it rises to about 1 in 30. These statistics clearly demonstrate the substantial escalation in risk as women age.
2. Higher risk of pregnancy complications: Advanced maternal age is associated with a higher likelihood of experiencing various pregnancy complications. According to a study published in the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, women aged 35 and older have an increased risk of gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, placenta previa, and premature birth. These complications can pose serious health risks to both the mother and the baby.
3. Decreased fertility and increased miscarriage risk: Women in their late 30s and beyond experience a decline in fertility. The ACOG reports that after the age of 35, a woman's chances of getting pregnant each month decrease significantly. Additionally, the risk of miscarriage also rises with advancing maternal age. According to a study published in the journal Fertility and Sterility, women aged 35-39 have a 20% chance of miscarriage, which increases to 35% for women aged 40-44.
4. Increased likelihood of pregnancy interventions: Advanced maternal age often necessitates additional medical interventions during pregnancy. Women over 35 are more likely to require assisted reproductive technologies, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), to achieve pregnancy. These interventions can be physically and emotionally taxing, as well as financially burdensome.
By spreading misinformation, you are disregarding the well-established scientific knowledge and putting women and their potential children at risk. It is crucial to prioritize evidence-based information and encourage individuals to consult healthcare professionals who can provide accurate guidance based on each person's unique circumstances.
I implore you to stop spreading dangerous misinformation and instead advocate for responsible and informed discussions that prioritize the health and well-being of women and their children. Science offers us invaluable insights that should guide our decisions and actions for the betterment of society as a whole.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Be concerned and monitor closely don't listen to the people on here they think they can defy science
this isn't defying science - the women of yesteryear who had 12+ children were all having children past 35. you have no idea WHAT you are talking about.