Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:50 is fine when you’re that wealthy. She’ll have lots of hired help, I bet.
Yeah because those kids always turn out so well.
Anonymous wrote:It's definitely too late at 50
Anonymous wrote:50 is fine when you’re that wealthy. She’ll have lots of hired help, I bet.
Anonymous wrote:This was posted in the other thread (now locked since this one was here first) in response to that PP saying that Naomi was "breaking the glass ceiling" by having babies in her 50s:
Couldn’t disagree more. Women have been blessed with the inability to have children long past when they should.
How a man dates without a vasectomy perplexes me.
I’m so happy to have a hysterectomy! I have three healthy kids and get to raise them when I’m an active part of their lives - then am free from having more!
You see it as oppression I see it as natures gift to us. And I LOVe kids/ had three in my early 30s
And I love it. We view declining fertility as a curse but what if we viewed it as a blessing? The ability to not worry about having another child is glorious. I say this as someone who married late and had one kid in my late 30s, and then chose to be one and done because given my age, I decided it was better to pour my energy into my existing child then to have more.
Anonymous wrote:50 is fine when you’re that wealthy. She’ll have lots of hired help, I bet.
Couldn’t disagree more. Women have been blessed with the inability to have children long past when they should.
How a man dates without a vasectomy perplexes me.
I’m so happy to have a hysterectomy! I have three healthy kids and get to raise them when I’m an active part of their lives - then am free from having more!
You see it as oppression I see it as natures gift to us. And I LOVe kids/ had three in my early 30s
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s selfish and messed up whether a man or woman does this.
Anonymous wrote:50 is too old to become a mom period
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s selfish and messed up whether a man or woman does this.