Anonymous wrote:The first book group I was in was with a group of friends/friends of friends who were all decent readers. We'd move around house to house, the person hosting would also present 'her' book for the evening. It was a potluck dinner situation which was distracting with all the fussing around food. Not everyone would have read the book, so it mostly just turned into a dinner party with people who had mostly read the same book and were kind of discussing it.
The group I'm in now is more serious and has a facilitator we pay a nominal amount to. We choose the books in 3 or 4 month increments, mostly Booker winners or such. Sometimes we'll toss in a memoir to mix it up. It's in the evening, no food beyond tea/coffee and a small snack or dessert. It's in a member's house who is centrally located to the rest of us. I love this group! The discussions are largely kept to the book, the author, but on occasion we'll veer off if someone has personal anecdotes that relate to the work. It's so interesting, I read things I otherwise would not and it takes me out of the rest of me life.
Anonymous wrote:I once enjoyed being in a "reverse book club." Instead of all reading the same book and discussing it, when we met each person spoke for 2-3 minutes about a book they recently read, and whether or not the recommended it. This was a great way to get exposure to both books you might like and ones you would never read yourself. It also minimized opportunity for disagreement, because not everyone had read or formed opinions about the books being discussed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was in one with a group of friends, but half the time we got derailed with other conversations or people wouldn’t read the book.
I love discussing books but am very much a mood reader. Hard to commit to a book club where books are pre-chosen.
Same! Having assigned reading makes me feel like I'm back in school.
You're not being graded. It's not assigned. It's voluntary.
Anonymous wrote:I have been part of two successful book clubs.
The first has been going on for many years and focused on biographies. However, the people in it were much older than me and all retired, and they wanted to meet during the day. I didn't find the biographies they chose very interesting, not diverse at all and mostly dead people from the previous century or earlier.
I find the second one much better. It's all women and they are younger than me, but they pick contemporary works that are new and have come out in the last year or two. I find the discussions well run and we meet over drinks at a bar. I just find it is a better fit for me and they meet at night which is easier when you work.
Anonymous wrote:I've been in two. In both cases, I found people coming who didn't read the book, and tried to derail conversations about the book. One book club kept veering towards books only available on hardcover, which was also annoying. I prefer now to read what I want and use this forum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was in one with a group of friends, but half the time we got derailed with other conversations or people wouldn’t read the book.
I love discussing books but am very much a mood reader. Hard to commit to a book club where books are pre-chosen.
Same! Having assigned reading makes me feel like I'm back in school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have tried twice. The key to a good book club is not having one dominant personality who bulldozes everyone with their opinion and doesn't let anyone else speak. I experienced this twice and it's permanently put me off trying again.
We have discussion questions based on the book that we take turns answering. This keeps the dominant talkers somewhat in check as people are taking turns speaking.
Anonymous wrote:I have tried twice. The key to a good book club is not having one dominant personality who bulldozes everyone with their opinion and doesn't let anyone else speak. I experienced this twice and it's permanently put me off trying again.