Anonymous wrote:My grandmother got pregnant with her youngest child at 47, almost 17 years after her previous baby. Healthy pregnancy and healthy baby. My uncle is younger than 3 of his nieces and nephews.
Anonymous wrote:I am not trying to get pregnant, just not being careful with birth control at that age. I don’t want another child though probably won’t terminate in the 0.1% chance that it happens. Or is the probability higher is what I am asking?
Zero issues conceiving our kids at age 38 and 42, if that matters.
Anonymous wrote:Look around at your family - has anyone had kids at 45+? On either side? For me, that answer is no, so I am comfortable going without at 45.
If my family was like the one where grandmothers did, I’d stay on BC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP this is so stupid. Why take a totally unnecessary risk with your health? Use birth control. Don’t be ridiculous.
Not to mention the fact that if you don't carry the risk of your child have a disability is much higher and the risk of you experiencing life threatening complications is much higher.
Anonymous wrote:OP this is so stupid. Why take a totally unnecessary risk with your health? Use birth control. Don’t be ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Yes it happens. However, if you're serious about wanting to get pregnant start IVF immediately. (Today!)
Anonymous wrote:My MIL
Anonymous wrote:Are you in a state where abortion is legal? If not, I would be super careful with birth control. If you wind up pregnant and want to terminate for medical reasons, you may be forced to carry to term. Or you may have a miscarriage and be unable to seek medical care for yourself until you are "sick enough."