Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable
That’s what you get for being cheap. Can’t bargain shop with the Wisc test.
What do you mean cheap? So GMU charges less and provides less quality service? Any data points?
Anonymous wrote:Aren't the tests at GMU administered by grad students? Isn't that why it's cheaper?
Anonymous wrote:My child got a very generic form letter indicating he was eligible for Level II Subject Specific Advanced Differentiation in all areas of learning. So I sent an email questioning why he wasn't just given Level III services. Lo and behold, two days later I received the same generic form letter indicating my child is now going to receive Level III services at our local elementary school. Our AART is worthless, IMO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable
That’s what you get for being cheap. Can’t bargain shop with the Wisc test.
Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable
Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable
Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable