Anonymous wrote:Keep in mind in op’s situation the sibling who got the money now lives a much grander lifestyle than the less favored siblings. That’s weird.
Anonymous wrote:Keep in mind in op’s situation the sibling who got the money now lives a much grander lifestyle than the less favored siblings. That’s weird.
Anonymous wrote:I'm interested in what others think of this scenario. Parents are in their 80s and have 3 adult kids, all professionals, married, and doing well. Two of the children, with their spouses, are doing very well financially. The third has a job in the church and their spouse has a well-paying professional job - they are doing fine financially but clearly not as well as the other children. When that child (who also has some health problems) moved to take a new job in the church, they wanted to live in a large house in the most desirable neighborhood of a large city, have their kids attend the best private schools, etc. but couldn't afford to do so (this would be a living standard above that of the other two siblings). As a result, the parents decided to gift $1 million of their estate early to that child. They told one of the other children about it at the time but did not tell the other (presumably to avoid the difficult conversation). Several years later, this has all come to light and it is awkward. The parents' position is that nothing will be done to even things out (now or later) as this gift was for "need". Thoughts? Advice?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s their money and there’s no obligation to give everyone the same.
Or to give it at the same time.
One set of former in laws got $30k a year from my then MiL to pay for Jewish day school for their eldest (wife was SAH). They considered it differently than disbursements from the parents to the other kids for down payments for cars/mortgages or other expenses. Cue a lot of anxiety over how the estate will be divided. In the end, though, it was the parents’ money to give as they pleased.
NP, I see that differently. Grandparents giving tuition money to grandchildren shouldn't count against the money that kids get. As long as MIL would have paid for Jewish school for all grandchildren.
My grandma had 4 kids. 3 had only one child and my parent had 2 children. Should my sibling and I get half of the inheritance that all my cousins are getting? My grandma would have liked as many grandchildren as possible and wanted to celebrate them all.
Anonymous wrote:
I have seen so many fights over inheritance. My mother and her siblings were locked in a 25 year court battle over their father's will because their brother stole his sisters' inheritance. My BIL is making jealous noises over my MIL's plan for her inheritance, because he's not happy his two brothers will get more, for various reasons that MIL has spelled out clearly and in advance.
And here I am, with one child with special needs who might have difficulty getting or keeping jobs, and one highly-functional child. I am tempted to divide my estate equally between them, just because no matter how I explain it, the child who has less might always feel slighted. Also because I don't know what the future will bring to either one. But it will also depend on how my child with SN grows up and how functional he gets.
The best I can do is work on our family bond, and make sure they appreciate one another, so that if ever one needs help after I'm gone, the other will be OK stepping in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s their money and there’s no obligation to give everyone the same.
Or to give it at the same time.
One set of former in laws got $30k a year from my then MiL to pay for Jewish day school for their eldest (wife was SAH). They considered it differently than disbursements from the parents to the other kids for down payments for cars/mortgages or other expenses. Cue a lot of anxiety over how the estate will be divided. In the end, though, it was the parents’ money to give as they pleased.