Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at a school with a significant percentage of Asian-American students but mostly white teachers. We've noticed over the past year that when teachers have a choice to choose students for leadership positions such as for panels, if they have a request from an outside entity for students to speak with, student hosts for assemblies, or for leaders for class project they are not selecting AAPI students. It's really striking and when parents first brought this up to us I was skeptical but then we saw it happen again and again. They will choose students from other minority groups who comprise only a small percentage of students at the school so it is not all white students who are being chosen.
We moved to the area from California where we were at a school with a similar percentage of AAPI students and did not see this issue. What is going on? Is it just gross stereotyping that AAPI students are not good leaders or speakers? Are we just at a terrible school?
Are AAPI kids never being selected, or just not being selected at a proportion equivalent to their representation in the school? So, let's say the school is 50% Asian American, 25% white, and 25% Black. If a panel has 3 kids on it, are there zero AAPI kids, or just one from each group?
If the former, that's an issue. If the latter, I think there are good reasons to include a diverse cross-section of kids in leadership positions. It's good for the under-represented groups to see themselves in leadership roles. Yes, that might make "competition" for the majority group a little more intense, but it's not "systemic bias." It is weighting the good of multiple different groups.
I also have this question. I think it’s reasonable to expect there to be some effort made that leadership opportunities fully represent the student body and that groups representing the school are diverse. However, I think it’s absolutely not okay to exclude AAPI (which is made up of so many different subgroups with diverse experiences and opinions!) from leadership opportunities and especially not okay if the population of the school is majority AAPI.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds like you've described a school that selects URMs. That's not anti-AAPI bias.
Fwiw, there a number of AAPI students in FCPS of different backgrounds and some are high achieving and others are average. Don't have all the same concerns.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The way this area handles race is very different than how they do it out West. Race is much more explicit here, everything is about race. It's really strange, coming from other parts of the country. Doesn't seem to be better, either. But that's how they roll here.
Lol clearly you’ve never been to Seattle or SF.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The way this area handles race is very different than how they do it out West. Race is much more explicit here, everything is about race. It's really strange, coming from other parts of the country. Doesn't seem to be better, either. But that's how they roll here.
Lol clearly you’ve never been to Seattle or SF.
Those aren't representative of anywhere besides themselves.
Those are the population centers of the west coast.
Anonymous wrote:The way this area handles race is very different than how they do it out West. Race is much more explicit here, everything is about race. It's really strange, coming from other parts of the country. Doesn't seem to be better, either. But that's how they roll here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The way this area handles race is very different than how they do it out West. Race is much more explicit here, everything is about race. It's really strange, coming from other parts of the country. Doesn't seem to be better, either. But that's how they roll here.
Lol clearly you’ve never been to Seattle or SF.
Those aren't representative of anywhere besides themselves.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds like you've described a school that selects URMs. That's not anti-AAPI bias.
Fwiw, there a number of AAPI students in FCPS of different backgrounds and some are high achieving and others are average. Don't have all the same concerns.
Anonymous wrote:We are at a school with a significant percentage of Asian-American students but mostly white teachers. We've noticed over the past year that when teachers have a choice to choose students for leadership positions such as for panels, if they have a request from an outside entity for students to speak with, student hosts for assemblies, or for leaders for class project they are not selecting AAPI students. It's really striking and when parents first brought this up to us I was skeptical but then we saw it happen again and again. They will choose students from other minority groups who comprise only a small percentage of students at the school so it is not all white students who are being chosen.
We moved to the area from California where we were at a school with a similar percentage of AAPI students and did not see this issue. What is going on? Is it just gross stereotyping that AAPI students are not good leaders or speakers? Are we just at a terrible school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at a school with a significant percentage of Asian-American students but mostly white teachers. We've noticed over the past year that when teachers have a choice to choose students for leadership positions such as for panels, if they have a request from an outside entity for students to speak with, student hosts for assemblies, or for leaders for class project they are not selecting AAPI students. It's really striking and when parents first brought this up to us I was skeptical but then we saw it happen again and again. They will choose students from other minority groups who comprise only a small percentage of students at the school so it is not all white students who are being chosen.
We moved to the area from California where we were at a school with a similar percentage of AAPI students and did not see this issue. What is going on? Is it just gross stereotyping that AAPI students are not good leaders or speakers? Are we just at a terrible school?
Are AAPI kids never being selected, or just not being selected at a proportion equivalent to their representation in the school? So, let's say the school is 50% Asian American, 25% white, and 25% Black. If a panel has 3 kids on it, are there zero AAPI kids, or just one from each group?
If the former, that's an issue. If the latter, I think there are good reasons to include a diverse cross-section of kids in leadership positions. It's good for the under-represented groups to see themselves in leadership roles. Yes, that might make "competition" for the majority group a little more intense, but it's not "systemic bias." It is weighting the good of multiple different groups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sounds like you've described a school that selects URMs. That's not anti-AAPI bias.
Fwiw, there a number of AAPI students in FCPS of different backgrounds and some are high achieving and others are average. Don't have all the same concerns.
It is biased if the selection is not based on merit.
No it isn’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at a school with a significant percentage of Asian-American students but mostly white teachers. We've noticed over the past year that when teachers have a choice to choose students for leadership positions such as for panels, if they have a request from an outside entity for students to speak with, student hosts for assemblies, or for leaders for class project they are not selecting AAPI students. It's really striking and when parents first brought this up to us I was skeptical but then we saw it happen again and again. They will choose students from other minority groups who comprise only a small percentage of students at the school so it is not all white students who are being chosen.
We moved to the area from California where we were at a school with a similar percentage of AAPI students and did not see this issue. What is going on? Is it just gross stereotyping that AAPI students are not good leaders or speakers? Are we just at a terrible school?
Are AAPI kids never being selected, or just not being selected at a proportion equivalent to their representation in the school? So, let's say the school is 50% Asian American, 25% white, and 25% Black. If a panel has 3 kids on it, are there zero AAPI kids, or just one from each group?
If the former, that's an issue. If the latter, I think there are good reasons to include a diverse cross-section of kids in leadership positions. It's good for the under-represented groups to see themselves in leadership roles. Yes, that might make "competition" for the majority group a little more intense, but it's not "systemic bias." It is weighting the good of multiple different groups.
Anonymous wrote:We are at a school with a significant percentage of Asian-American students but mostly white teachers. We've noticed over the past year that when teachers have a choice to choose students for leadership positions such as for panels, if they have a request from an outside entity for students to speak with, student hosts for assemblies, or for leaders for class project they are not selecting AAPI students. It's really striking and when parents first brought this up to us I was skeptical but then we saw it happen again and again. They will choose students from other minority groups who comprise only a small percentage of students at the school so it is not all white students who are being chosen.
We moved to the area from California where we were at a school with a similar percentage of AAPI students and did not see this issue. What is going on? Is it just gross stereotyping that AAPI students are not good leaders or speakers? Are we just at a terrible school?
Anonymous wrote:It sounds like you've described a school that selects URMs. That's not anti-AAPI bias.
Fwiw, there a number of AAPI students in FCPS of different backgrounds and some are high achieving and others are average. Don't have all the same concerns.