Anonymous wrote:Brits like to take the mickey out of how we hate to walk everywhere until they move to America and realize how spread out things are. They often forget that their entire country is the size of Florida. People in NYC walk exactly the same amount as people in London. People in the burbs walk exactly the same amount as people in East Bumble UK. I have lived in all four places. I am also married to a Brit who used to love making fun of me for this. Ten years of suburban living later, you best believe he’s driving that car from one end of the shopping center to the other.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, taking long walks (1+ hours) on pavement is awful on your knees & feet, even if you don’t feel the impact immediately.
Second, if not owning a car correlated with being fitter, those who do not own cars & whom are completely reliant on public transportation (including public buses) for their every need would be the fittest among us. Obviously, that is not the case.
I’ve been running a few miles almost daily for 25 years and have zero problems with my knees or feet. People tell themselves lies to support their own inclinations.
Anonymous wrote:First of all, taking long walks (1+ hours) on pavement is awful on your knees & feet, even if you don’t feel the impact immediately.
Second, if not owning a car correlated with being fitter, those who do not own cars & whom are completely reliant on public transportation (including public buses) for their every need would be the fittest among us. Obviously, that is not the case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, taking long walks (1+ hours) on pavement is awful on your knees & feet, even if you don’t feel the impact immediately.
Second, if not owning a car correlated with being fitter, those who do not own cars & whom are completely reliant on public transportation (including public buses) for their every need would be the fittest among us. Obviously, that is not the case.
Walking for an hour plus is awful on your knees and feet? The “impact” of WALKING? Is this some kind of troll post? How horrendously out of shape are you? Let me guess, if somebody does any amount of running their knees will explode by the time they are 60.
Unreal. Absent some health condition not of your own making, if you can’t walk 10 miles and you are under the age 65, you are doing life wrong. Most Americans can’t walk FIVE miles to save their life.
It’s not exclusively an American thing. I know plenty of sedentary Brits and continental Europeans. And even those that do walk a lot that just eat and drink poorly.
It’s like idiocracy sometimes. Where is the brawndo?
You missed the “on pavement” part. Versus on soft surfaces.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on whether you’re in a city/suburb/rural area. In some burbs in the US, it’s not possible to walk 30 min in one direction without hitting a 4-lane busy road that has no sidewalks or crosswalks.
I know and find that pretty sad. I would feel trapped. Never understood the appeal of suburbs.
You must be very well-off. Cities are for the rich, the young & the poor.
It’s very difficult to afford a good QOL as a middle class family in a city.
DP. For me good QOL includes being able to walk to shopping, dining and the library. So, I live in a city (Brooklyn) the way people in Europe live in the cities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on whether you’re in a city/suburb/rural area. In some burbs in the US, it’s not possible to walk 30 min in one direction without hitting a 4-lane busy road that has no sidewalks or crosswalks.
I know and find that pretty sad. I would feel trapped. Never understood the appeal of suburbs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on whether you’re in a city/suburb/rural area. In some burbs in the US, it’s not possible to walk 30 min in one direction without hitting a 4-lane busy road that has no sidewalks or crosswalks.
I know and find that pretty sad. I would feel trapped. Never understood the appeal of suburbs.
You must be very well-off. Cities are for the rich, the young & the poor.
It’s very difficult to afford a good QOL as a middle class family in a city.
DP. For me good QOL includes being able to walk to shopping, dining and the library. So, I live in a city (Brooklyn) the way people in Europe live in the cities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on whether you’re in a city/suburb/rural area. In some burbs in the US, it’s not possible to walk 30 min in one direction without hitting a 4-lane busy road that has no sidewalks or crosswalks.
I know and find that pretty sad. I would feel trapped. Never understood the appeal of suburbs.
You must be very well-off. Cities are for the rich, the young & the poor.
It’s very difficult to afford a good QOL as a middle class family in a city.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, taking long walks (1+ hours) on pavement is awful on your knees & feet, even if you don’t feel the impact immediately.
Second, if not owning a car correlated with being fitter, those who do not own cars & whom are completely reliant on public transportation (including public buses) for their every need would be the fittest among us. Obviously, that is not the case.
Walking for an hour plus is awful on your knees and feet? The “impact” of WALKING? Is this some kind of troll post? How horrendously out of shape are you? Let me guess, if somebody does any amount of running their knees will explode by the time they are 60.
Unreal. Absent some health condition not of your own making, if you can’t walk 10 miles and you are under the age 65, you are doing life wrong. Most Americans can’t walk FIVE miles to save their life.
It’s not exclusively an American thing. I know plenty of sedentary Brits and continental Europeans. And even those that do walk a lot that just eat and drink poorly.
It’s like idiocracy sometimes. Where is the brawndo?
You missed the “on pavement” part. Versus on soft surfaces.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, taking long walks (1+ hours) on pavement is awful on your knees & feet, even if you don’t feel the impact immediately.
Second, if not owning a car correlated with being fitter, those who do not own cars & whom are completely reliant on public transportation (including public buses) for their every need would be the fittest among us. Obviously, that is not the case.
Walking for an hour plus is awful on your knees and feet? The “impact” of WALKING? Is this some kind of troll post? How horrendously out of shape are you? Let me guess, if somebody does any amount of running their knees will explode by the time they are 60.
Unreal. Absent some health condition not of your own making, if you can’t walk 10 miles and you are under the age 65, you are doing life wrong. Most Americans can’t walk FIVE miles to save their life.
It’s not exclusively an American thing. I know plenty of sedentary Brits and continental Europeans. And even those that do walk a lot that just eat and drink poorly.
It’s like idiocracy sometimes. Where is the brawndo?