Anonymous wrote:3% is a perfectly reasonable COLA.
I think plenty of us would be okay paying teachers more if they were full time, year round. Teachers forget how much time they have off when they’re comparing their salaries. 80k would be 100k if they worked year round and got 3 weeks vacation.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain to me how FCPS think a 3% raise will help retain and recruit talent? This is a shame!
How can we FCPS parents help chance this scenario? Our teachers deserve much better. Shame on our School Board. I am 😤!
Anonymous wrote:I am a 5 year teacher and I only make $60. Kinda hard to live in this area as a single woman.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My private sector company is also giving 3%.
I’m sure your salaries are much higher to begin with.
My child's teacher makes $80k+
Ok. Unless they are married, 80,000 doesn’t get you much in this area. Salaries should match COL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:they only work 180 days a year, and 7 hours a day...........
Actually the minimum contract is 195 days and I have an 8 hour contract day. I average 9.5 hours a day. I guess you could subtract the 10 minutes it takes me to eat a sandwich-but I have students hanging out for lunch so maybe not.
It doesn’t really matter what you think of teacher salaries and schedules. What matters is the number of vacant jobs and the unqualified people who will end up staffing your child’s classes. Look at the special education vacancies. Even the ‘good’ schools can’t fill them.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain to me how FCPS think a 3% raise will help retain and recruit talent? This is a shame!
How can we FCPS parents help chance this scenario? Our teachers deserve much better. Shame on our School Board. I am 😤!
Anonymous wrote:they only work 180 days a year, and 7 hours a day...........
Anonymous wrote:I got 0% this year, so . . .
Anonymous wrote:they only work 180 days a year, and 7 hours a day...........