Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eating three times a day (and spending 3 hours cooking and eating) is not optimal for your health after the age of 22.
So I just found you an extra hour. You're welcome.
You're not running one hour of errands every day. You're not having sex for an hour every day. You're not socializing with the community for two hours every day, although you can have a job where you socialize.
Correct, you should be eating a lot more that including snacking.
only if you want to be fat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eating three times a day (and spending 3 hours cooking and eating) is not optimal for your health after the age of 22.
So I just found you an extra hour. You're welcome.
You're not running one hour of errands every day. You're not having sex for an hour every day. You're not socializing with the community for two hours every day, although you can have a job where you socialize.
?????????
You think people should eat once a day?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eating three times a day (and spending 3 hours cooking and eating) is not optimal for your health after the age of 22.
So I just found you an extra hour. You're welcome.
You're not running one hour of errands every day. You're not having sex for an hour every day. You're not socializing with the community for two hours every day, although you can have a job where you socialize.
Correct, you should be eating a lot more that including snacking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WHO is doing this daily?!
"30 mins-1 hr sex/physical pleasure
1 hr errands
2 hrs of community/socializing"
DAILY??? Nope.
Save time by combining them.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Eating three times a day (and spending 3 hours cooking and eating) is not optimal for your health after the age of 22.
So I just found you an extra hour. You're welcome.
You're not running one hour of errands every day. You're not having sex for an hour every day. You're not socializing with the community for two hours every day, although you can have a job where you socialize.
Anonymous wrote:Eating three times a day (and spending 3 hours cooking and eating) is not optimal for your health after the age of 22.
So I just found you an extra hour. You're welcome.
You're not running one hour of errands every day. You're not having sex for an hour every day. You're not socializing with the community for two hours every day, although you can have a job where you socialize.
Anonymous wrote:I can’t necessarily relate to OP’s exact breakdown of hours spent. But I do feel like a 40 hour per week job makes it difficult to do all the things I want for my health: time for long walks, healthy meal prep, medical appointments, etc. Not to mention the mental stress of trying to keep up with everything.
It’s why I have a flexible remote job. Even still it feels like a lot (I also have 3 kids and a DH who works full time). We have to outsource some things like cleaning. I wish I had more time for a hobby or volunteering at the school. I sometimes feel resentful that we as a society have picked 40 as the totally random a$$, arbitrary number for a work week. It’s not like there is any science to support this is an optimal productivity timeframe. And since employers would try to squeeze every oz of work out of us as possible, we can’t really rely on them to cut hours. I don’t know what the answer is, but I feel a societal shift coming in how people expect to balance work/life.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is this works for some jobs and not others. If you do this for police, firefighters, teachers, sanitation workers, doctors, etc. then you need to sudddenly hire a bunch more of them.
Anonymous wrote:During COVID I cut back to a 6 hour work day and it was great. Even now that I’m full time I basically only really do work 9-3 with a lunch break in between. There are diminishing returns beyond that. Yeah I’m online and can respond to emails, but I run out of gas and need to save some mental energy for my family.
The 40 hour work week is very incompatible with the rise of dual income families.